2015
DOI: 10.13182/nse14-156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Neutron Cross Section Group Structures on the Accuracy of Radiological Source Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences relative to the MCNP results were consistent in comparison with literature with three main exceptions, 89 Zr, 57 Ni, and 56 Mn productions. The primary reason for the difference is the nonoptimal weighting functions for the generation of the multigroup cross sections described in Sections III-B and III-E and highlighted in [36]. The underestimation of the 89 Zr and 57 Ni production cross sections by the SCALE Sampler 252-group simulation results from the 1/E flux weighting of the 13.8-14.6-MeV group utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences relative to the MCNP results were consistent in comparison with literature with three main exceptions, 89 Zr, 57 Ni, and 56 Mn productions. The primary reason for the difference is the nonoptimal weighting functions for the generation of the multigroup cross sections described in Sections III-B and III-E and highlighted in [36]. The underestimation of the 89 Zr and 57 Ni production cross sections by the SCALE Sampler 252-group simulation results from the 1/E flux weighting of the 13.8-14.6-MeV group utilized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a study evaluated the activation of materials with a neutron source between various group structures [24]. The reported differences ranged between approximately 5% and 50%, which was directly attributed to the generation of the cross section [36].…”
Section: A Nuclear Data Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy-dependent flux was calculated using the 172 energy groups in the XMAS structure [9]. The XMAS structure was used to generate the energy-dependent flux spectrum at the D6 NW3 position.…”
Section: Calculation Of Energy-dependent Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies [10,11] have demonstrated that the fine CCFE-709 and a fortiori the UKAEA-1102 group structure have been optimised to comprehensively cover all applications.…”
Section: Namementioning
confidence: 99%