2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of negative affect on reality discrimination

Abstract: . (2014) 'The impact of negative aect on reality discrimination.', Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry., 45 (3). pp. 389-395. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.04.001Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports previous research using source memory tasks, which found that words associated with traumatic events were not more likely to be externally misattributed ( Bendall et al, 2011 ), but stands in contrast to research suggesting that emotionally negative outcomes affect low-level sensorimotor agency ( Yoshie & Haggard, 2013 ) and higher-level attributional biases ( Mezulis et al, 2004 ). Previous research has, however, shown that inducing negative affect in participants causes an increase in the number of external misattributions on a typical auditory signal detection paradigm ( Hoskin et al, 2014 , Smailes et al, 2014 ). This might imply that the content of the inner speech does not play a role in its misattribution, but instead a general state of negative affect may cause an increase in the likelihood of external misattributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This supports previous research using source memory tasks, which found that words associated with traumatic events were not more likely to be externally misattributed ( Bendall et al, 2011 ), but stands in contrast to research suggesting that emotionally negative outcomes affect low-level sensorimotor agency ( Yoshie & Haggard, 2013 ) and higher-level attributional biases ( Mezulis et al, 2004 ). Previous research has, however, shown that inducing negative affect in participants causes an increase in the number of external misattributions on a typical auditory signal detection paradigm ( Hoskin et al, 2014 , Smailes et al, 2014 ). This might imply that the content of the inner speech does not play a role in its misattribution, but instead a general state of negative affect may cause an increase in the likelihood of external misattributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…An auditory signal detection task (SDT) was used modeled on those used by Smailes et al (2014) and Moseley et al (2014). Participants were asked to listen to 60 trials containing 5-s bursts of white noise, played over headphones.…”
Section: Study 2: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, some voice-hearers are thought to have a trait-like bias in their reality discrimination skills, so that they tend to misattribute internal, self-generated cognitions to an external, non-self source (Brookwell et al, 2013 ). Moreover, this bias can be exacerbated by negative affect (Hoskin et al, 2014 ; Smailes et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Cbt For Inner Speech-based Avhmentioning
confidence: 99%