2024
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of myelosuppression on quality of life of patients treated with chemotherapy

Jeffrey Crawford,
Dana Herndon,
Katerina Gmitter
et al.

Abstract: Side effects from chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression can negatively affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Neutropenia increases infection risk, and anemia frequently results in debilitating fatigue. Additionally, the bleeding risk associated with thrombocytopenia can lead to fear and anxiety. However, traditional interventions for myelosuppression fall short of the ideal. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors reduce the risk of severe neutropenia but commonly lead to bone pain. Erythropoiesis-stimulating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The administration of induction chemotherapy was found to decrease the NLR and improve the outcomes of cancer patients receiving anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy [30]. However, severe myelosuppression during anti-cancer therapy has been reported to negatively affect the survival outcomes of cancer patients, because severe myelosuppression (such as neutropenia) leads to the delay, interruption, and dose reduction of anti-cancer treatments [31]. Taken together, these factors explain why patients with grade 3 neutropenia had significantly shorter OS than those without severe neutropenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The administration of induction chemotherapy was found to decrease the NLR and improve the outcomes of cancer patients receiving anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy [30]. However, severe myelosuppression during anti-cancer therapy has been reported to negatively affect the survival outcomes of cancer patients, because severe myelosuppression (such as neutropenia) leads to the delay, interruption, and dose reduction of anti-cancer treatments [31]. Taken together, these factors explain why patients with grade 3 neutropenia had significantly shorter OS than those without severe neutropenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelet profiles varied significantly among malignancies, with patients with leukemia exhibiting a higher prevalence of thrombocytopenia and those with lymphoma showing a higher prevalence of thrombocytosis. These findings may reflect differences in platelet production, consumption, and the underlying pathophysiology of hematological cancers [ 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods for treating bone marrow suppression include the administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (RhG-CSF), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and blood transfusions. However, each of these approaches has its drawbacks: RhG-CSF can induce bone pain, erythropoiesisstimulating agents may lead to thrombosis, and blood transfusions can trigger transfusion reactions [13]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%