1976
DOI: 10.1086/ntj41862083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Municipal Electric Profits on Local Public Finance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colberg (1955) reported that Florida cities with large amounts of property exempt from taxes used electric utility enterprise surpluses to hold down property taxes--in effect substituting enterprise surpluses for property tax revenue lost through exemptions. Similar conclusions were arrived at by Strauss and Wertz (1976) and Vogt (1978), who studied North Carolina cities and, later, by DeHoog and Swanson (1988) in another study of Florida cities. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1987,1990,1993).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Colberg (1955) reported that Florida cities with large amounts of property exempt from taxes used electric utility enterprise surpluses to hold down property taxes--in effect substituting enterprise surpluses for property tax revenue lost through exemptions. Similar conclusions were arrived at by Strauss and Wertz (1976) and Vogt (1978), who studied North Carolina cities and, later, by DeHoog and Swanson (1988) in another study of Florida cities. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1987,1990,1993).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It also accounted for the effects of all other revenue sources--utility enterprises, intergovernmental revenues from federal, state, and county sources, and revenues from all other municipal sources, as well as per capita income, and whether the city had a city manager (ICMA, 1993). Together, these independent variables represent an expansion of earlier models (DiLorenzo, 1982;Khan & Stumm, 1994;Strauss & Wertz, 1976) and control for city size, economic conditions, and form of government. The dependent variables are per capita expenditures and own-revenues, both in total (less enterprise revenues and expenditures) and for the general fund, and per capita property taxes and valuation.…”
Section: Net Revenue Transfer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some states do seem to use their liquor stores to help finance other state activities, although such a purpose is certainly not part of the external costs supposedly being controlled by state ownership. This is consistent with Strauss and Wertz's (1976) finding that a substantial portion of North Carolina municipal electric utility profits were used to finance the general fund. In addition, substituting liquor store profits for general tax effort undoubtedly has distributional implications, because spending on liquor is likely to be more regressive than are general taxes.…”
Section: Liquor Stores Lotteriessupporting
confidence: 86%