2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617709090730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of multiple sclerosis on patients’ performance on the Stroop Test: Processing speed versus interference

Abstract: Deficits in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients' performance on the Stroop Test have been attributed to problems with processing speed and selective attention. Data for 248 MS patients and 178 controls on all three trials of the Stroop were combined using various scoring formulas proposed for assessing processing speed, color difficulty, and interference. The greatest differences between patients and controls involved processing speed. Formulas purporting to measure interference yielded highly inconsistent result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
66
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
66
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stroop task was chosen because previous studies had identified that people with MS exhibit delayed Stroop responses compared to subjects without MS, even in mild stages of the disease [28][29][30][31][32]. These other studies, however, generally employed a more complex visual color-word paradigm with more than two response choices, whereas our study employed a twochoice auditory Stroop paradigm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroop task was chosen because previous studies had identified that people with MS exhibit delayed Stroop responses compared to subjects without MS, even in mild stages of the disease [28][29][30][31][32]. These other studies, however, generally employed a more complex visual color-word paradigm with more than two response choices, whereas our study employed a twochoice auditory Stroop paradigm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), we created a processing speed variable for each of the two tests, Color-Word Interference and Trail-Making (henceforth abbreviated as PS CW and PS TMT , respectively). To create PS CW , the Word-Reading and Color-Naming subtest scores of Color Word Interference Task were combined, as has been done previously (Denney & Lynch, 2009). To create PS TMT , the Number-Sequencing and Letter-Sequencing sub-test scores of the Trail-Making Task were combined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroop Test is a measure of speed information processing and response inhibition [97]. A series of colored XXX and color words printed in black are presented on a computer screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%