“…Until recently the imaging of soil structure was dominated by thin sectioning and scanning electron microscopy, and in many ways, these techniques are still relevant today (Bryk, 2018; Skvortsova & Kalinina, 2004) for microbial activity studies and chemical/mineral analysis (Hapca, Wang, Otten, Wilson, & Baveye, 2011). The current major driver of 3D structural studies is XCT methodology (Cnudde et al, 2006; Gerke, Skvortsova, & Korost, 2012), as it allows non‐destructive 3D information to be obtained on a number of scales ranging from ∼1 μm resolution for microtomography scanners (Kravchenko, Negassa, Guber, & Rivers, 2015; Skvortsova et al, 2016; Skvortsova et al, 2018) up to ∼100–300 μm for medical devices or industrial macrotomography scanners (Koestel & Larsbo, 2014; Li and Hu et al, 2019). Due to the inherently multiscale hierarchical nature of the Earth's numerous porous media (Dimitriadis et al, 2019), including soil, none of these methods alone is enough to achieve the ultimate goal of creating a 3D digital structure model because of the sample size versus imaging resolution trade‐off (Gerke, Karsanina, & Mallants, 2015; Rabot, Wiesmeier, Schlüter, & Vogel, 2018).…”