2013
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Molecular Data on Our Understanding of Bee Phylogeny and Evolution

Abstract: Our understanding of bee phylogeny has improved over the past fifteen years as a result of new data, primarily nucleotide sequence data, and new methods, primarily model-based methods of phylogeny reconstruction. Phylogenetic studies based on single or, more commonly, multilocus data sets have helped resolve the placement of bees within the superfamily Apoidea; the relationships among the seven families of bees; and the relationships among bee subfamilies, tribes, genera, and species. In addition, molecular ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
157
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
12
157
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, their ability to regulate protein and lipids is more similar to arthropod predators than herbivores, perhaps because pollen is more nutritionally similar to prey (versus leaf tissue) with high protein and lipid concentrations (Jensen et al, 2011;Raubenheimer et al, 2007). Because bees are a monophyletic group evolved from predatory wasps (Danforth et al, 2013), it is likely that bees maintained their protein and lipid biases when making the transition to pollen feeding. There might be taxaspecific P:L intake targets across bee families, genera or species that could explain the patterns of foraging behavior and pollen preferences observed among host-plant species in field-based studies (Behmer and Joern, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, their ability to regulate protein and lipids is more similar to arthropod predators than herbivores, perhaps because pollen is more nutritionally similar to prey (versus leaf tissue) with high protein and lipid concentrations (Jensen et al, 2011;Raubenheimer et al, 2007). Because bees are a monophyletic group evolved from predatory wasps (Danforth et al, 2013), it is likely that bees maintained their protein and lipid biases when making the transition to pollen feeding. There might be taxaspecific P:L intake targets across bee families, genera or species that could explain the patterns of foraging behavior and pollen preferences observed among host-plant species in field-based studies (Behmer and Joern, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in social behavior are correlated with changes in signaling chemistry in L. albipes (42). In halictids, two major sources of chemical signals have been described: the cuticle and the Dufour's gland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within halictids, there have been two to three gains of eusociality and at least 12 reversions to solitary behavior (42). These repeated gains and losses allow the identification of common changes in communication systems against phylogenetically independent changes in social structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basal clades of most bee families include a high proportion of oligolecs (Westrich 1989;Wcislo and Cane 1996) and it has been argued that oligolecty is the basal state in bees with polylecty being a derived state with multiple origins (Müller 1996;Danforth et al 2013). One of the suggested mechanisms by which oligolecty is maintained is that plants may chemically protect their pollen to prevent overexploitation, thus necessitating specialisation to process difficult metabolites (Praz et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%