2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Malaysian Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
94
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
94
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A research study is condeucted in Malaysia by Samer et al (2015) regarding finding the impact of microfinance on reducing poverty. This studyreported that household income of the recipients is positively affceted by microfinance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research study is condeucted in Malaysia by Samer et al (2015) regarding finding the impact of microfinance on reducing poverty. This studyreported that household income of the recipients is positively affceted by microfinance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro finance is an effective tool to reduce poverty [Sayed, Izaidin, Syaiful, Muhamad, Sarah & Nlizwa (2015); and Norma & Jarita (2011)]. The concept of micro finance has been introduced in the 1700s in Ireland (Sayed et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Definition Of Loan Repayment Defaultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of micro finance has been introduced in the 1700s in Ireland (Sayed et al, 2015). As time goes by, there are widespread successes of several microfinance programs around the world, such as Bangladesh's Grameen Bank, Bank Rakyat Indonesia, ACCION in Latin America, the Center for Agriculture and Rural Development (CARD) in Philippines and so on.…”
Section: The Definition Of Loan Repayment Defaultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since borrowers spend a major part of their income for food (Rahman & Ahmed, 2010), it is found by Agbola et al (2017) that per capita food expenditure differs significantly between borrowers and non-borrowers. The health of the members of borrower's household is found to have improved as the borrowers spend their income for treatment or health purposes (Agbola et al, 2017;Samer et al, 2015). Borrowers' housing condition is also found to have improved due to their increased ability to spend (Mazumder & Lu, 2015) and established borrowers are found to spend more for education purposes (Onyina & Turnell, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%