2017
DOI: 10.21201/2017.8937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Interventions on People Affected by Humanitarian Emergencies: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(231 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability and usefulness of process evaluations was assessed by two reviewers using a standard tool for process studies—which has been widely applied in systematic reviews and informed by principles of qualitative research—[ 26 ] including the following six criteria: whether the sampling strategy was indicated; whether data collection methods were indicated—including any statements around increasing rigour of data collection; the degree of data analysis—including any statements around efforts made to improve reliability of findings and reduce bias; the extent to which the study findings were grounded in the data; the extent to which the study privileged the perspectives of intervention participants; and the breadth and depth of findings. Studies were assigned two types of ‘weight of evidence’ based on the reliability or trustworthiness of the findings and the usefulness of the findings for shedding light on factors relating to the research questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability and usefulness of process evaluations was assessed by two reviewers using a standard tool for process studies—which has been widely applied in systematic reviews and informed by principles of qualitative research—[ 26 ] including the following six criteria: whether the sampling strategy was indicated; whether data collection methods were indicated—including any statements around increasing rigour of data collection; the degree of data analysis—including any statements around efforts made to improve reliability of findings and reduce bias; the extent to which the study findings were grounded in the data; the extent to which the study privileged the perspectives of intervention participants; and the breadth and depth of findings. Studies were assigned two types of ‘weight of evidence’ based on the reliability or trustworthiness of the findings and the usefulness of the findings for shedding light on factors relating to the research questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broader findings for psychosocial interventions for people after humanitarian emergencies align with these themes. A 2017 systematic review found that, while psychosocial interventions may decrease emotional and conduct problems as well as PTSD symptoms (Mukdarut et al, 2017, Chiumento, Dickson, & Felix, 2017, they generally did not improve functioning.…”
Section: Pgi May Also Target a Different Level Of Resilience Than What Would Affect Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they may allow refuges to forge new social connections and share information and advice regarding livelihood activities, host community relations, and conditions in South Sudan. Additionally, these gatherings might have psychosocial benefits for their participants, which respondents explained are among the most significant aspects of their social relationships in the settlements (Mukdarut et al 2017). Aid actors should consider interventions to assist refugees to remain connected or to reconnect with their pre-displacement social networks in South Sudan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%