2013
DOI: 10.3159/torrey-d-13-00035.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of mast years on seedling recruitment following canopy thinning and deer fencing in contrasting northeastern U.S. coastal forests1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No tall oak saplings were recorded in controls. Our results are consistent with earlier studies of oak regeneration and effects of protection from browsing (Abrams, 2013;Bergquist et al, 2009;Jensen et al, 2012;Kelly, 2002;Pigott, 1983;Thomas-van Gundy et al, 2014). Exclosures were intentionally placed over relatively high density of oak seedlings and saplings; this was also true for controls, and the results of the BACI-test show that the density of oak seedlings and small oak saplings did not differ initially between controls and exclosures.…”
Section: Exclosures Favour Natural Oak Regeneration But Only Weaklysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No tall oak saplings were recorded in controls. Our results are consistent with earlier studies of oak regeneration and effects of protection from browsing (Abrams, 2013;Bergquist et al, 2009;Jensen et al, 2012;Kelly, 2002;Pigott, 1983;Thomas-van Gundy et al, 2014). Exclosures were intentionally placed over relatively high density of oak seedlings and saplings; this was also true for controls, and the results of the BACI-test show that the density of oak seedlings and small oak saplings did not differ initially between controls and exclosures.…”
Section: Exclosures Favour Natural Oak Regeneration But Only Weaklysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In exclosures, they were as predicted taller, although their density was low and varied between sites. Several authors reported reduced height of oak seedlings and saplings due to browsing (Abrams, 2013;Bergquist et al, 2009;Kullberg and Bergström, 2001) and that taller stems were browsed to a higher extent (Bergqvist et al, 2012;Götmark et al, 2005;Jensen et al, 2012;. For instance, roe deer feed on plants from the ground level up to about 120 cm, but prefer to feed around 75 cm (Duncan et al, 1998).…”
Section: Exclosures Favour Natural Oak Regeneration But Only Weaklymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many other researchers (e.g. Abrams and Johnson 2012 ; Bressette et al 2012 ; Nuttle et al 2013 ; Abrams 2013 ; Owings et al , this issue) also report negative impacts of abundant deer on native tree species, implying that forest regeneration could be at risk. Shrubs, including L. benzoin , R. periclymenoides and V. acerifolium , also appear negatively influenced by deer ( Tables 6 and 7 ), which jeopardizes organisms in other trophic levels that depend on forest understory shrub layers, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The selective browsing of cervids (e.g. deer, moose, elk) is considered one of the main determinants of forest understory plant species composition and structure ( Alverson et al 1988 ; Côté et al 2004 ; Abrams 2013 ). Herbivore-mediated shifts in plant communities can limit native plant regeneration, alter the abundance of small mammals, birds and insects, lower ecological stability (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%