The Impact of Market Environment on Excess Capacity and the Cost of an Empty Hospital Bed

Abstract

The health economics literature contains contradictory empirical findings regarding the cost of an empty hospital bed. Recent empirical studies which account for the endogeneity of reserve capacity produce high estimates of these costs, while earlier studies and industry experts maintain that empty beds are cheap. This paper provides evidence which helps to reconcile the controversy. The cost of excess bed capacity will depend upon staffing levels of different types of labor in the hospital. We provide a relationship between capacity utilization, productive efficiency, and the cost of empty beds, and then compare the utilization of bed capacity in four very different market environments. These are the highly regulated, public Norwegian hospitals, who face very little competitive pressure, and the unregulated, private California hospitals, divided into three groups with variation in ownership and competitive environment. We find considerable variation in input utilization and excess capacity, with different implications for the cost of empty beds across the hospital groups and their respective market environments. Our findings suggest that the cost of an empty bed varies with market conditions, hence the seemingly contradictory findings in the literature are to be expected. Our findings also suggest an interesting area of future research: the impact of managed care on reserve capacity in hospitals.Hospital, Efficiency, Capacity, Reserve Capacity, Competition, Option Demand, Cost Of An Empty Bed, Staffed Bed,

Comparing hospital cost efficiency between Norway and Finland

“…Hansen and Zwanziger [7] compared marginal costs in general acute care among US and Canadian hospitals [7]. Mobley and Magnussen [8] and Magnussen and Mobley [9] examined the relative performance of Norwegian (regulated, public) and Californian (unregulated, competitive) hospitals using empirical data from 1997 [8,9]. Steinman et al [10] compared a sample of Swiss and German hospitals [10].…”

Evaluation and Analysis for Chinese Medical Alliance’s Governance Structure Modes Based on Preker-Harding Model

“…As shown in Figure 2, there are three typical system elements (governance, market environment, financing arrangements) that influence incentives and hospital behavior [19]. Governance refers to the relationship between the owner (government) and the hospital [20]; the market environment refers to the degree of multiple market pressures in which the hospital operates normally [21]; the financing arrangement refers to the structure in which funds flow from the fundraiser or the payer to the hospital [22]. According to research by Preker and Harding, these three factors depend on the combined impact of the five key incentives facing the hospital [1].…”

A New Input‐Oriented Plant Capacity Notion: Definition and Empirical Comparison

“…We offer a selection of plant capacity estimates in a variety of economic sectors. Magnussen and Rivers Mobley (1999) compare Norwegian public and highly regulated hospitals to the Californian private and less regulated hospitals. Key findings are that the Norwegian hospitals have higher plant capacity utilization, and that the excess capacity in California depends on competitive pressures.…”