2016
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to explore the differences in the level of knowledge sharing between co-workers in high versus low trust situations, for cognition-based trust and for affect-based trust as well as implicit and explicit knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The differences were examined through data provided by 102 professionals working for a financial organization in The Netherlands. Findings The differences in the level of knowledge sharing in high versus low trust situations are significant. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
101
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(55 reference statements)
7
101
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…They are not easily noticeable and hard to measure; however, their indirect influence proves to play a crucial role in value creation. A lot of studies have been dedicated to the general idea of explicit knowledge sharing, but only a few focuses on tacit knowledge [57][58][59]. The aim of the presented study is to prove that tacit knowledge sharing is a tool that builds a personal brand of knowledge workers in a project environment which in result leads to the performance improvement.…”
Section: Tacit Knowledge Sharing: Challenge For Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are not easily noticeable and hard to measure; however, their indirect influence proves to play a crucial role in value creation. A lot of studies have been dedicated to the general idea of explicit knowledge sharing, but only a few focuses on tacit knowledge [57][58][59]. The aim of the presented study is to prove that tacit knowledge sharing is a tool that builds a personal brand of knowledge workers in a project environment which in result leads to the performance improvement.…”
Section: Tacit Knowledge Sharing: Challenge For Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Open sharing of relevant knowledge has the potential to lower costs and optimize processes. The lack of sharing may harm organizations and even render their processes ineffective [57]. Polanyi [21] was among the first to classify knowledge as explicit or tacit.…”
Section: Tacit Knowledge Sharing: Challenge For Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menurut Olowodunoye (2015), bahwa lamanya kerja seseorang juga berpengaruh pada kepercayaan di antara karyawan. Penelitian empiris Rutten, Blaas-Franken, & Martin (2016) terhadap karyawan organisasi keuangan di Belanda memperlihatkan bahwa tingginya kepercayaan mengarah pada tingginya tingkat berbagi pengetahuan, dan rendahnya tingkat kepercayaan mengarah pada rendahnya tingkat berbagi pengetahuan. Penelitian empiris Ahmadi et al (2012) terhadap karyawan dari 10 cabang bank pemerintah dan swasta di Teheran, memperlihatkan bahwa kepercayaan, berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap berbagi pengetahuan.…”
Section: Pengaruh Kepercayaan Terhadap Berbagi Pengetahuanunclassified
“…Terdapat pengaruh kepercayaan terhadap komitmen organisasional karyawan di Kantor Cabang Utama PT Bank Panin Tbk Kota Pontianak Secara teoritis dan empiris, menurut Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995) kepercayaan interpersonal berkontribusi pada peningkatan (improvement) perilaku berbagi pengetahuan di antara pekerja. Penelitian empiris Ahmadi et al (2012); Rutten et al (2016); Javadi et al (2012); Gazor et al (2012); Zubair et al (2015) membuktikan dalam penelitian mereka bahwa kepercayaan memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap berbagi pengetahuan.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified
“…Cognition-and affect-based trust have direct effects on behavioural intentions [34]. In cognition-based trust, physicians are deemed professional during their communication with the patients [31], then patients' opinions establish the reliability and competence of physicians [18], and these factors remove the uncertainty of the patient-physician relationship [37]. On this basis, the patients are increasingly willing to understand and trust the information given by their physicians [31] and comply with the provided medical diagnoses and treatment regimens.…”
Section: Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%