2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02420.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of lifestyle on the physical fitness of primary school children

Abstract: Lifestyle could possibly be a key factor and predictor of physical fitness and health outcomes. The finding of this study may enhance the identification of healthy lifestyle which may improve health outcomes in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were asked to sign consent forms before the assessments were administered. Its measurement and instrument details were described [16,17] previously. Body height in centimeters (cm) and body weight in kilograms (kg) were measured in the physical fitness assessment.…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were asked to sign consent forms before the assessments were administered. Its measurement and instrument details were described [16,17] previously. Body height in centimeters (cm) and body weight in kilograms (kg) were measured in the physical fitness assessment.…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the extensibility of muscle as well as the non-contractile tissues, such as . [4] joint capsule, ligaments, and tendons Inflexibility screening field test, the most common used measure is the [5,6] sit-and Reach test (SRT). SRT are commonly used to [7] evaluate the hamstring and lower back flexibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, flexibility screenings and field tests often include a single measurement thought to represent general flexibility. The most commonly used measure is the sit and reach test, [62][63][64][65][66][67] which is a composite assessment of gastrocnemius, hamstring, buttock, lumbar, thoracic, and scapular flexibility. 68 The modified sit and reach 68 and the back saver sit and reach tests 69 are alternatives for assessing flexibility; however, their use may be limited as normative data have not been published.…”
Section: Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%