2018
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5710-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of LHC jet data on the MMHT PDF fit at NNLO

Abstract: We investigate the impact of the high precision ATLAS and CMS 7 TeV measurements of inclusive jet production on the MMHT global PDF analysis at next-to-nextto-leading order (NNLO). This is made possible by the recent completion of the long-term project to calculate the NNLO corrections to the hard cross section. We find that a good description of the ATLAS data is not possible with the default treatment of experimental systematic errors, and propose a simplified solution that retains the dominant physical info… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such modifications to gluon PDF are not totally unexpected. The MMHT14 gluon PDF [6], which closely resembles that of CT14, acquires rather similar modifications when confronted with the 7 TeV high-luminosity inclusive jet data [30]. Also, attributed to including 8 TeV differential topquark data, the NNPDF3.1 fit has large-x gluons suppressed compared to CT14 and MMHT14 [31].…”
Section: Proton-proton Dijet Spectra and Ct14 Reweightingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Such modifications to gluon PDF are not totally unexpected. The MMHT14 gluon PDF [6], which closely resembles that of CT14, acquires rather similar modifications when confronted with the 7 TeV high-luminosity inclusive jet data [30]. Also, attributed to including 8 TeV differential topquark data, the NNPDF3.1 fit has large-x gluons suppressed compared to CT14 and MMHT14 [31].…”
Section: Proton-proton Dijet Spectra and Ct14 Reweightingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, as we will see it is the correlation across different distributions that drives the observed deterioration in fit quality. To investigate the above effect further, we first follow the study of [3] and evaluate the variation in the preferred values of the corresponding systematic shifts in (1) when fitting to the different distributions individually. Any significant tension between these values will then indicate that when fitting the distributions in combination, some deterioration in the fit quality will occur, and moreover that a less restrictive degree of correlation between the distribution for the corresponding shift may be preferred by the data/theory comparison.…”
Section: Understanding the Poor Fit Quality: The Role Of Correlated Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should in particular be emphasised that this issue is not bypassed by fitting to one individual distribution alone, which would artificially mask the issues in fitting the complete dataset, while also risking introducing a bias into the fit, through the particular choice of distribution that is made.Further study of the above effects is clearly essential, and indeed in [16], the source of this poor fit quality was traced to a small subset of dominant two-point systematic uncertainties associated with the choice of Monte Carlo generator or input parameters, used in the data unfolding to the parton-level results which are included in the PDF fit. A rather significant improvement in the fit quality, with a relative stability in the resultant gluon, was then observed by introducing some decorrelation in a given systematic error between distributions, reminiscent of the studies [3,11] for the case of jet production. On the other hand, this study was only performed within the ATLAS PDF framework, fitting to a limited dataset and with a rather…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The factorization has been applied successfully at collider and fixed target experiments. In particular, it is possible to consistently extract universal parton distribution functions (PDFs) within global analyses from different processes and experiments [4][5][6][7][8]. These phenomenological results support the validity of QCD factorization in proton-proton (p + p) collisions and the universality of PDFs, which ensures the predictive power of the approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%