1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01498813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of legal constraints on voter registration, turnout, and the composition of the American electorate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that examine the impact of electoral laws on turnout at the individual level have relied on the Voter Supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS) (see, e.g., Oliver, 1996;Mitchell & Wlezien, 1995;Wolfinger & Rosenstone, 1980). The large number of cases sampled from every state allows for sufficient variation in electoral arrangements such as registration requirements and large samples of subgroups of voters such as absentee voters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that examine the impact of electoral laws on turnout at the individual level have relied on the Voter Supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS) (see, e.g., Oliver, 1996;Mitchell & Wlezien, 1995;Wolfinger & Rosenstone, 1980). The large number of cases sampled from every state allows for sufficient variation in electoral arrangements such as registration requirements and large samples of subgroups of voters such as absentee voters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teixeira (1992), and Mitchell and Wlezian (1995) using survey data, produce estimates ranging from 3 to 6 percentage points. vi None of these studies account for the fact that EDR could not have had any effect on one third of Minnesota and Wisconsin residents, who were not required to register at all before the advent of EDR.…”
Section: Edr: the First Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The debate surrounding who is most likely to benefit from relaxed registration laws has concentrated on education as the characteristic of interest. 2 Most of the early studies (Highton, 1997;Mitchell & Wlezien, 1995;Nagler, 1994;Teixeira, 1992;Wolfinger & Rosenstone, 1980) suggest that EDR leads to the largest turnout gains among those with the lowest levels of education. Nagler (1991) challenges Wolfinger and Rosenstone's results, but his own 1994 article revises his original claims; and though he argues that the mechanism differs, Nagler (1994) arrives at the same substantive conclusion as Wolfinger and Rosenstone (1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%