The Impact of Leaders’ Emotional Intelligence on Perceived Individual Performance: Moderated by Perceived Organizational Competitive Advantage (Comparative Study between Iraq and Turkey)

Hamdany, Zaid

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4117656

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Notably, 44% of these articles investigated multiple professional groups, underlining the researchers' intent to examine job performance across various job roles and organizations (e.g., Hamdany, 2022;Ližbetinová et al, 2017;Cetinkaya et al, 2019;Danish et al, 2015;Newman et al, 2015;Andjarwati et al, 2019;Aziz et al, 2022;Thura et al, 2019;Ye et al, 2020;Trivellas et al, 2016). The majority of the studies primarily explored Process/job performance at the individual level, constituting 48.78% of the total articles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the organizational level (26.83% of the articles), Process/job performance studies delved into organizational processes, practices, and systems influencing productivity, while Contextual performance studies highlighted the role of employees' extra-role contributions in enhancing organizational culture and climate (e.g., Alashab & Mohamad, 2020;Almarakshi et al, 2019;Sinha & Laghate, 2023;Arshad et al, 2015;Saltson, 2015;Dekoulou & Trivellas, 2015). In terms of Outcome performance, at the individual level (24.39% of the articles), Financial performance received substantial attention, focusing on the financial outcomes achieved by individuals and organizations, alongside studies exploring non-financial outcomes like customer satisfaction and service quality (e.g., Hamdany, 2022;Ližbetinová et al, 2017;Cetinkaya et al, 2019;Danish et al, 2015;Newman et al, 2015;Andjarwati et al, 2019). At the team level (9.76% of the articles), Outcome performance investigations were divided into Financial performance and Non-financial performance, providing a comprehensive view of teams' impact on organizational effectiveness (e.g., Aziz et al, 2022;Thura et al, 2019;Trivellas et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Team level Organizational level financial performance (Hamdany, 2022); (Ližbetinová, et al, 2017). (Trivellas, et al, 2016) (Kalkavan & Katrinli, 2015).…”

Section: Individual Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Literature Review on Job Performance in Diverse Organizations from 2010 to 2023

Alqarni,

Hamsan,

Mohd Rasdi

et al. 2023

IJARBSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Employee performance profoundly influences organizational success, posing a global challenge. This systematic literature review (SLR) investigates job performance dimensions from 2010 to 2023, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Data were searched via Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Books, yielding 3450 records, reduced to 942 postdeduplications. After title and abstract screening, 829 records were excluded, leaving 41 studies for the final review. The findings categorize job performance into three levels: individual, team, and organizational, further divided into process/job performance and outcome performance. Most studies focus on individual-level process/job performance, with limited attention to organizational-level outcome performance. Employee performance's critical role in organizational effectiveness underscores its relevance to researchers and practitioners. The review emphasizes the importance of fostering supportive work environments and providing resources to enhance employee performance, ultimately driving organizational success. These insights are invaluable to those aiming to optimize employee performance and bolster organizational effectiveness.

show abstract