2021
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02347-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of joint attention on the sound-induced flash illusions

Abstract: Humans coordinate their focus of attention with others, either by gaze following or prior agreement. Though the effects of joint attention on perceptual and cognitive processing tend to be examined in purely visual environments, they should also show in multisensory settings. According to a prevalent hypothesis, joint attention enhances visual information encoding and processing, over and above individual attention. If two individuals jointly attend to the visual components of an audiovisual event, this should… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…showed significant sign consistency. This trend was further explored within each category, revealing significant effects in 89.19% 27.66%, and 46.67%, of the Confidence, Metacognitive Sensitivity, and Cognitive Psychology effects (four visual search effects and all three effects from Battich et al, 2021), compared with only 7.69% of the unconscious processing effects, as reported above (see Figure 4). These results validate the potential of using sign consistency to reveal effects on cognition and perception.…”
Section: Testing Within-participant Sign Consistency Across Experimen...mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…showed significant sign consistency. This trend was further explored within each category, revealing significant effects in 89.19% 27.66%, and 46.67%, of the Confidence, Metacognitive Sensitivity, and Cognitive Psychology effects (four visual search effects and all three effects from Battich et al, 2021), compared with only 7.69% of the unconscious processing effects, as reported above (see Figure 4). These results validate the potential of using sign consistency to reveal effects on cognition and perception.…”
Section: Testing Within-participant Sign Consistency Across Experimen...mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Metacognitive sensitivity was quantified as the area under the response-conditional type-2 Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (Meuwese et al, 2014; here we also excluded datasets that did not include accuracy scores; the remaining 47 effects were analyzed). Third, we grouped effects from the Reproducibility Project (Open Science Collaboration, 2015), the Classic Visual Search Effects open dataset (Adam et al, 2021), and a single study from the social media query (Battich et al, 2021) under a more general "Cognitive Psychology" category. For these studies, we tested the sign consistency of the effect tested by the original authors (averaged difference or interaction effects).…”
Section: Testing Within-participant Sign Consistency Across Experimen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature source 2°Wilkie et al, 2008;Nava et al, 2013;Brang et al, 2012;Pérez-Bellido et al, 20152.5°Gavin et al, 20223°Kostaki et al, 20164°Vanes et al, 20164.1°Balz et al, 2016;Keil & Senkowski, 2017;Kaiser et al, 2019;Scurry et al, 20214.17°Neufeld et al, 2012Haß et al, 20174.5°Bidelman, 2016Bidelman & Heath, 20184.75°Roseboom et al, 20135°Shams et al, 2000Tremblay et al, 2007;Innes-Brown & Crewther, 2009;Bolognini et al, 2011Bolognini et al, , 2013Bolognini et al, , 2016de Haas et al, 2012;Kumpik et al, 2014;Stapleton et al, 2014;Abadi & Murphy, 2014;Whittingham et al, 2014;Deloss & Andersen, 2015;Brighina et al, 2015;O'Brien et al, 2017;Gieseler et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2021;Battich et al, 2021;Gavin et al, 20225.1°Kawabe, 20095.5°Keil et al, 20135.67°Apthorp et al, 20136°van Der Smagt et al, 2007Takeshima & Gyoba, 20156.29°Wahn et al, 20206.3°Meylan & Murray, 20077°Wozny et al, 2008Rosenthal et al, 2009;Takeshima et al, 2013;…”
Section: Eccentricity (°)mentioning
confidence: 99%