2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-3319(01)00110-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: a test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
393
5
28

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
22
393
5
28
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Battu et al (1999), Jones Johnson and Johnson (2000), and Vila and García-Mora (2005) show a positive relationship between the two. Finally, Lambert et al (2001) find no relationship.…”
Section: Determinants Of Job Satisfaction: An Overview Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…By contrast, Battu et al (1999), Jones Johnson and Johnson (2000), and Vila and García-Mora (2005) show a positive relationship between the two. Finally, Lambert et al (2001) find no relationship.…”
Section: Determinants Of Job Satisfaction: An Overview Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mobley and colleagues suggested that turnover intention moderated the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover, and most researchers now accept the antecedent that intention to stay or leave in an organization for employees is the final cognitive step in the process of voluntary turnover (Steel and Ovalle, 1984). As a result, turnover intention has been incorporated in most turnover models developed in the past years (Lambert, Hogan and Barton, 2001). Fishbein and Ajzen's (1975: 369) stressed that "the best predictor of an individual's behavior will be measure of his intention to perform that behavior".…”
Section: Continuance Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good school -based management requires effective school leadership whereby school head teachers are able to handle both external operations as well as the school environment interaction (Lambert et al, 2001). This is because leadership involves interpersonal influence exercised on others through communication process towards the attainment of certain goal (Akerele, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%