2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in thoracic and abdominal CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is most likely the result of CT3 being the only CT scanner without an iterative reconstruction technique. The difference in radiation exposure in this study is in accordance with previous studies, which reported a significant reduction of radiation exposure in CT due to the use of iterative reconstruction instead of filtered back projection [10,11]. National DRLs for CT examinations have been reported for many countries, e. g. for Ireland [2], Germany [4], the United Kingdom [12], Canada [1], Portugal [13], Switzerland [14] and the US [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is most likely the result of CT3 being the only CT scanner without an iterative reconstruction technique. The difference in radiation exposure in this study is in accordance with previous studies, which reported a significant reduction of radiation exposure in CT due to the use of iterative reconstruction instead of filtered back projection [10,11]. National DRLs for CT examinations have been reported for many countries, e. g. for Ireland [2], Germany [4], the United Kingdom [12], Canada [1], Portugal [13], Switzerland [14] and the US [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…As previously reported (6)(7)(8)(9)13,14,16,18,19,(21)(22)(23)(26)(27)(28)(29), IR algorithms enable a lower radiation dose for body CT acquisitions while preserving image quality. An evaluation of the 50% dose CT protocol by our four readers confirmed these findings, as diagnostic confidence was maintained and the subjective image quality of the reduced-dose images was still above average when compared to the reference, 100% dose images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The potential for dose reduction using IR while preserving image quality has already been the subject of several publications (8,11,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), but only a few studies have analyzed both chest and abdominal CT images (10,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and none have focused on young patients. As young patients represent the most radiosensitive population (25), they most urgently require an optimized radiation exposure, especially when they frequently undergo CT examinations, such as for follow-up of oncological disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative reconstruction techniques are more and more commonly applied in clinical practice. Often a dose reduction is reported when switching to these techniques [51]. Since effect of iterative reconstruction on (automated) image analysis is not yet known, it is recommended to store a second reconstruction using filtered back-projection aside from the iterative reconstruction kernel.…”
Section: Iterative Reconstruction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%