2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of ionic strength on the proton reactivity of clay minerals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ). However, the surface charge of kaolinite is pH-dependent 48 , 49 . Surface complexation modeling based on acid-base titrations of kaolinite shows that kaolinite surface functional groups are highly protonated at pH < 4.7, lending the clay a net positive charge (supplementary note 4), which can electrostatically attract negatively charged P species (dominantly H 2 PO 4 − at pH 2–7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ). However, the surface charge of kaolinite is pH-dependent 48 , 49 . Surface complexation modeling based on acid-base titrations of kaolinite shows that kaolinite surface functional groups are highly protonated at pH < 4.7, lending the clay a net positive charge (supplementary note 4), which can electrostatically attract negatively charged P species (dominantly H 2 PO 4 − at pH 2–7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface complexation modeling (SCM) was used to model the protonation‐deprotonation behavior of functional groups on the surfaces of minerals in mud samples as a function of solution pH. Since the mud samples are mostly composed of clay minerals, we applied the same model for protonation and deprotonation surface reactions as used in previous clay studies (Barbier et al., 2000; Hao et al., 2018; Hao, Flynn, et al., 2019; Ikhsan et al., 2005; Lackovic et al., 2003; Peacock & Sherman, 2005). The following surface complexation reactions and corresponding mass action equations were used: LNa+H+LH+Na+ K=[LH]αNa+[LNa]αH+ XOHH++0.25emXO normalKa=[XO]αH+[XOH] XOH+H+XOH2+ normalKa+=[XOH2+][XOH]αH+ …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cadmium was chosen based on its wide use in biosorption studies and it is representative of a wide range of trace metals (e.g. Liu et al, 2015;Hao et al, 2019Hao et al, , 2020. Initially 100 ml of 0.56 M NaCl was added to a 150 ml glass beaker.…”
Section: Cadmium Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both D. cuprea and C. major are characterized by approximately 50% of Cd adsorption at pH 9, whereas A. marina faecal material is characterized by approximately 25% Cd adsorption at this pH. Surface complexation models (SCMs) provide a more versatile solution over traditional adsorption isotherm approaches because they account for variations in system pH and ionic strength that can occur in an estuarine environment and impact the extent of metal adsorption (Fein, 2017;Alam et al, 2018;Alessi et al, 2019). Using the pK a values and site concentrations determined in the protonation models, a nonelectrostatic SCM approach was applied to the Cd adsorption data to calculate Cd adsorption equilibrium constants, invoking the following two reactions (except for A. marina which only invokes one adsorption site):…”
Section: Cadmium Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%