2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: Territory vs consumption emissions accounting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
150
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
33
150
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can interpret this to mean that the relationship between the two will be eliminated in the two‐lagged period. This result is consistent with those of Hasanov, Liddle, and Mikayilov () and Wang and Ang (). Third, there is unidirectional causality in the economic factors, such as from FDI or GDP per capita to import volume as well as from export volume or GDP per capita to FDI for the region as a whole.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can interpret this to mean that the relationship between the two will be eliminated in the two‐lagged period. This result is consistent with those of Hasanov, Liddle, and Mikayilov () and Wang and Ang (). Third, there is unidirectional causality in the economic factors, such as from FDI or GDP per capita to import volume as well as from export volume or GDP per capita to FDI for the region as a whole.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the one hand, Wang and Ang () analyze the impact of international trade on changes in CO 2 emissions at the global level from 1995 to 2009 and suggest that although growth in trade volumes contributed to total emissions, changes in emission intensity and the composition of trade‐related goods reduced emissions to a certain degree, particularly after 2005. Hasanov, Liddle, and Mikayilov (), on the other hand, focus on oil‐exporting developing economies to investigate the role of trade in CO 2 emissions and show an impact of statistically significant but opposite signs for the impact of international trade on consumption‐based CO 2 emissions. In addition, their study indicates that changes in the relationship between trade and CO 2 emissions will be well absorbed in about 3 years; however, international trade has a statistically insignificant impact on territory‐based CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMM applied on 29 countries over 1977-2014 in order to analyze the impact of different explanatory variables on CO2 emissions. [31]. Thus, according to [32][33][34] first generation test such as common root-Levin, Lin (LLC), Chu and Breitung, individual Im, Pesaran, shin (IPS), Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), and individual root-Fisher-PP, and Hadri have been computed individually from all explanatory variables.…”
Section: Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although a large number of empirical studies have been undertaken on decoupling analysis, the findings have still shown no uniformity with respect to the possible channels, key drivers and extents (states) of decoupling between carbon emissions and economic growth. For instance, some recent studies (Mikayilov et al, 2018;Piłatowska and Włodarczyk, 2018;Schroder and Storm, 2018, among others) confirmed the existence of decoupling between carbon emissions and growth. While, some other studies like Hilmi et al (2018) and Jiborn et al (2018) found no evidence of decoupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…That is, the growth rate of emissions remains positive, but less that the growth rate of GDP (OECD, 2002;Ru et al, 2012;Mikayilov et al, 2018;Piłatowska and Włodarczyk, 2018 as far as we have reviewed, no prior decoupling study has been done so far in Africa as a region.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%