2013
DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2013.863790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Internal Branding on Employee Engagement and Outcome Variables in the Hotel Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
125
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
9
125
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this research found that there was a positive relationship between employer branding and employee engagement in the furniture retail industry in Klang Valley. This finding supported the view of researchers in other industries like Ahmad and Daud (2016) and Lee, Kim and Kim, (2014). This study is also in line with Piyachat et al (2015) test on the relationships among employer branding, employee engagement in Thai petroleum industry.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The result of this research found that there was a positive relationship between employer branding and employee engagement in the furniture retail industry in Klang Valley. This finding supported the view of researchers in other industries like Ahmad and Daud (2016) and Lee, Kim and Kim, (2014). This study is also in line with Piyachat et al (2015) test on the relationships among employer branding, employee engagement in Thai petroleum industry.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cascio et al (2010) also suggested that organizations should employ internal marketing to convince employees that top management is committed to enhancing employee satisfaction, empowerment, and service quality. In the social-exchange theory, Cropanzano and Mitchell (2005), Lee et al (2013), and Paille and Boiral (2013) reported that employees who recognize top management commitment to employees' needs may reciprocate to have better work attitude as expected by top management. In this study, MCIM was characterized by using the actions of managers perceived by internal customers i.e., employees of an organization.…”
Section: Mcim and Ewamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to test the mediating roles of leader trust, organizational identification, and job performance between authentic leadership and employee loyalty, the Sobel test was conducted (Baron & Kenny, 1986;Lee et al, 2014;Preacher & Leonardelli, 2010-2012://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm). As shown in Table 5, authentic leadership has a significantly indirect effect on organizational identification through leader trust (coefficient = 0.577, p < 0.01).…”
Section: E Mediation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees rated their performance. Employee loyalty was measured using 3 items and adopted from the work of Lee, Kim, and Kim (2014 Table 1. There were more males (62.3%) than females (36.8%).…”
Section: B Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%