The Impact of Intercollegiate Athletics Financial Inequalities

Abstract

Inequality within intercollegiate athletics has roots as deep as the enterprise itself. From a macro perspective, financial inequality in intercollegiate athletics stems from free-market forces influencing intercollegiate athletics, specifically the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), television broadcasting, and the Bowl Championship Series (BCS). Because the NCAA operates on behalf of its member institutions, these inequalities trickle down to all conferences, universities, and athletic programs, to specific sports, and finally to student-athletes. The goal of this paper is to respond to Zimbalist (2013), add to the conversation about financial inequality in intercollegiate athletics, and describe how national inequalities translate into inequalities on campus. An analysis of the structure of intercollegiate athletics that perpetuates these inequalities is presented, Activity-Based Costing (ABC) is introduced, and practical ideas to assist in creating a more financially equitable model of intercollegiate athletics are presented. Inequality within intercollegiate athletics has roots as deep as the enterprise itself. From a macro perspective, financial inequality in intercollegiate athletics stems from free-market forces influencing intercollegiate athletics, specifically the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), television broadcasting, and the Bowl Championship Series (BCS). Because the NCAA operates on behalf of its member institutions, these inequalities trickle down to all conferences, universities, and athletic programs, to specific sports, and finally to student-athletes. Conference executives are charged with putting their member institutions in the best possible position for success and the free market reigns, with some conferences substantially more valuable than others. The BCS operates in the best interest of the Power Conferences (SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12, Big 12, and ACC) and certainly considers the new Group of Five (Big East, Mountain West, Conference USA, MAC, and Sun Belt), resulting in a smaller group of conferences and institutions that are directly affected by their operations. But, in reality, all colleges that compete in the NCAA are indirectly affected by the BCS. As in any free market, many factors exist that affect the value of institutions and conferences, such as competitive success, geographic region, tax status, overall brand strength, history, and religious affiliation. Decision-making and priorities along the way are critical components of any discussion on college athletics finance, and this is where NCAA, conferences, BCS, Lawrence is with the

Coaching Stressors in a Division II Historically Black University

“…Revenue for the NCAA 2010-2011 season brought in nearly 850 million dollars, with 69% of that going back to DI teams and only 5% being distributed to DII teams (Lawrence, 2013). Limited funds in DII programs convert to fewer scholarships than their DI counterparts.…”

Organizational Culture Mediates the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Work Outcomes

“…Financial stability remains one of the most significant challenges facing most intercollegiate athletic departments (Lawrence, 2013). Athletic program costs have continued to rise (Fulks, 2011) while departments face pressures to become more self-sustaining (Martinez, Stinson, & Jubenville, 2011).…”

Quality of Life is Lowest Among Female Athletes at the Community College Compared to University Sport Levels

“…However, female collegiate athletes competing at the NCAA, National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA), and student club sports (club) vary in sport commitment, training, and competition regulations (Dunn, 2013;Women's Sports Foundation [WSP], 2020). Likewise, the division categories (i.e., I, II, and III) and type of institution (i.e., private vs. public) could impact the health support and services provided within athletic departments (Lawrence, 2013), such as the number of private donations received and the sports competition wins awarded (Stinson & Howard, 2008;Tomasini, Frye, & Stotlar, 2004). Alumni donations, industry sponsorships, community partnerships, and national award winnings may influence the size of an athletic department's budget, and thus, allocation of resources (Stinson & Howard, 2008;Tomasini, Frye, & Stotlar, 2004).…”