2007
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4937-06.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Input Fluctuations on the Frequency–Current Relationships of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons in the Rat Medial Prefrontal Cortex

Abstract: The role of irregular cortical firing in neuronal computation is still debated, and it is unclear how signals carried by fluctuating synaptic potentials are decoded by downstream neurons. We examined in vitro frequency versus current ( f-I) relationships of layer 5 (L5) pyramidal cells of the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) using fluctuating stimuli. Studies in the somatosensory cortex show that L5 neurons become insensitive to input fluctuations as input mean increases and that their f-I response becomes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
107
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
13
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also hope that recent observations, like gain modulation by distal dendritic inputs or the divergence of the response functions in prefrontal cortex neurons (Arsiero et al 2007), can open the door for new quantitative models and their application to analysis of network behavior. While such an interaction between theory and experiment is a widely consolidated tradition in physics, it is becoming only slowly established in neuroscience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We also hope that recent observations, like gain modulation by distal dendritic inputs or the divergence of the response functions in prefrontal cortex neurons (Arsiero et al 2007), can open the door for new quantitative models and their application to analysis of network behavior. While such an interaction between theory and experiment is a widely consolidated tradition in physics, it is becoming only slowly established in neuroscience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, studies have shown that the "steady-state" (low-frequency) gain of neurons depends on the SD of stimulus noise (Chance et al, 2002;Longtin et al, 2002;Fellous et al, 2003;Shu et al, 2003;Higgs et al, 2006;Arsiero et al, 2007). Here, we investigated how frequencydependent gain depends on the stimulus power spectrum, measuring G( f ) in response to 1 ms exponential-filtered noise and 1/f noise, in addition to the 5 ms exponential-filtered noise described above.…”
Section: Frequency Response For Different Stimulus Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Higgs et al found that intrinsic mechanisms regulate how background noise affects the gain of responses to a parametrically varying mean DC signal (Higgs et al, 2006). Neurons can also modulate their sensitivity to fluctuations (i.e., noise) over a range of changes in stimulus mean (i.e., signal) (Arsiero et al, 2007). Our present findings show that intrinsic mechanisms can modulate neuronal gain under changes in the distribution of sensory inputs, when signal and noise are not identified a priori.…”
Section: Intrinsic Gain Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%