2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of individualism on buyer–supplier relationship norms, trust and market performance: An analysis of data from Brazil and the U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical details such as 17 million out of 143.2 million using mobile Internet in 2011 remain a concern where telecom and banking industry need to reach unbanked population (Archana, 2012;R. Gupta & Jain, 2014Ketkar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Problem Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical details such as 17 million out of 143.2 million using mobile Internet in 2011 remain a concern where telecom and banking industry need to reach unbanked population (Archana, 2012;R. Gupta & Jain, 2014Ketkar et al, 2012).…”
Section: Problem Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, the model was evaluated using the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique due to its widely and recent use in causal relation validations and specifically in supply chains (Ketkar et al . ). The SEM model is executed using WarpPls 4.0 software because its main algorithms are based on partial least squared, widely recommended for low sample size (Alcaraz et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to prove the hypotheses stated in Fig. 1, the model was evaluated using the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique due to its widely and recent use in causal relation validations and specifically in supply chains (Ketkar et al 2012). The SEM model is executed using WarpPls 4.0 software because its main algorithms are based on partial (Singh and Bhandarkar 1996;Garcia et al 2012) Providers always delivered me orders on time Suppliers always delivered me complete and accurate orders Supplier provide products according to quality standards There is communication with suppliers aimed to reduce failures There is coordination between supplier's production process and mine Suppliers are using information production systems as MRP, MRP II, SAP and RFID Demand (Rosenthal and Rosnow 1991;Padukone and Subba 1993) Demand is always informed by my customer in advance Demand is transmitted by my clients through information systems in real time Demand is "visible" in real time for my company, and for my suppliers Demand in finished product is very stable and does not affect production scheduling Quality and delivery time (Priestman 1985;Singh and Bhandarkar 1996;Rexhausen et al 2012) We deliver our products using the just in time philosophy Our company always provides complete orders Quality in my finished product meets the customer specifications Product quality is satisfactory (no client complaints in the last 3 years) Financial profits (Priestman 1985;Martínez-Jurado et al 2014) The marketing strategy in our company is focused on reducing total costs Our cash flow has improved over the last 3 years Our average sales growth has improved in the last 3 years MRP, Material Requirement Planning; RFID, Radio Frequency IDentification; SAP, Systems, Applications and Products.…”
Section: Stage 5: Structural Equation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM is considered a third-generation regression analysis technique, since it can associate latent variables in a relational and causal analysis (Avelar-Sosa et al, 2014). Moreover, it is widely used in SC research (Ketkar et al, 2012). In this study, the model was executed using WarpPls 5.0® software, based on Partial Least Squared (PLS) and widely recommended for non-normal data and small samples .…”
Section: Stage 5: Structural Equation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%