2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of increased oxygen conditions on metal-contaminated sediments part I: Effects on redox status, sediment geochemistry and metal bioavailability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several parameters affecting the levels and biotoxicity of trace metals in sediments. It appeared that seasonal variations of biotoxicity in this study is attributed to two reasons including (1) industrial effluents which can cause great heavy metal pollution (De Jonge et al 2012a) and (2) floods and storms during rainy period that can lead to release back from insoluble metal sulfides in sediments to water (Prica et al 2008;Van Den Berg et al 1999).…”
Section: Assessment Of Sediment Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are several parameters affecting the levels and biotoxicity of trace metals in sediments. It appeared that seasonal variations of biotoxicity in this study is attributed to two reasons including (1) industrial effluents which can cause great heavy metal pollution (De Jonge et al 2012a) and (2) floods and storms during rainy period that can lead to release back from insoluble metal sulfides in sediments to water (Prica et al 2008;Van Den Berg et al 1999).…”
Section: Assessment Of Sediment Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Several researchers reported that CuS phases of AVS cannot be completely extracted with 1 M HCl, and this issue may possibly lead to underestimation in the AVS concentrations of sediment samples (De Jonge et al 2012a;Simpson et al 1998). So, for every 3 g of each wet sediment sample, 5 mL of 6 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) was used for extraction of AVS and SEM.…”
Section: Avs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SAOB solution contained 2 M NaOH, 0.2 M ascorbic acid and 0.2 M disodium EDTA, which was the same as that used by van Griethuysen et al (2002). The amount of free sulfur ions in SAOB buffer was measured with an ion specific electrode (van Griethuysen et al, 2002;De Jonge et al, 2012). Quality of AVS extraction was ensured by calibrating the procedure against known amounts of Na 2 SÁ9H 2 O (Durán et al, 2012), and recoveries were within 85-94%.…”
Section: When the Ratio [Sem]/[avs] Is > 1 Or [Sem]-[avs] > 0 Toximentioning
confidence: 99%