2013
DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.757589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of including children with intellectual disability in general education classrooms on the academic achievement of their low-, average-, and high-achieving peers

Abstract: The results suggest that including children with ID in primary general education classrooms with support does not have a negative impact on the progress of pupils without disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If school psychology, as a field, is committed to developing a cohort of professionals who can work within the educational system as well as across school, community, and work environments, graduate programs and professional development must place a greater emphasis on issues and knowledge associated with postschool options for young people with disabilities. For example, topics such as UDL and self‐determination have been shown to improve academic and functional outcomes of students with and without disabilities in the short‐ and long‐term (Canazza, & Foresti, ; Coyne, Pisha, Dalton, Zeph, & Smith, ; Dessemontet, & Bless, ; McGuire & McDonnell, ; Test, Mazzotti et al, ; Wehmeyer & Palmer, ). Career development theory and strength‐based assessments not only harken to the mandated goals of IEPs (postschool oriented and focused on the strengths of the student, respectively; Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, ), but also allow for increased family–school–community partnerships and input (Talapatra, Miller et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If school psychology, as a field, is committed to developing a cohort of professionals who can work within the educational system as well as across school, community, and work environments, graduate programs and professional development must place a greater emphasis on issues and knowledge associated with postschool options for young people with disabilities. For example, topics such as UDL and self‐determination have been shown to improve academic and functional outcomes of students with and without disabilities in the short‐ and long‐term (Canazza, & Foresti, ; Coyne, Pisha, Dalton, Zeph, & Smith, ; Dessemontet, & Bless, ; McGuire & McDonnell, ; Test, Mazzotti et al, ; Wehmeyer & Palmer, ). Career development theory and strength‐based assessments not only harken to the mandated goals of IEPs (postschool oriented and focused on the strengths of the student, respectively; Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, ), but also allow for increased family–school–community partnerships and input (Talapatra, Miller et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litvack, Ritchie and Shore () also support this evidence and noted that high achievers reported more often that they learnt less. However, Dessemontet and Bless () found no significant difference in the progress of the low‐, average‐, or high‐achieving pupils from classrooms with or without inclusion, suggesting that inclusion does not have a negative impact on the progress of pupils without disability.…”
Section: Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La educación inclusiva tiene múltiples beneficios para los alumnos con o sin discapacidades, incluyendo mayor rendimiento académico y mejores relaciones sociales (Cosier, Causton-Theoharis y Theoharis, 2013;Cushing y Kennedy, 19976;Sermier Dessemontet y Bless, 2013). Las investigaciones indican que las relaciones de confianza entre padres y profesionales y un fuerte y comprometido liderazgo escolar fortalecen las prácticas inclusivas y los resultados de las partes involucradas (Goddard, Tschannen-Moran y Hoy, 2001: Sweetland y Hoy, 2000.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified