2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12310-019-09333-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Implementation Fidelity on Student Outcomes in the Life Skills Training Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In their meta‐analysis of school‐based social and emotional learning programs, Durlak et al (2011) noted the importance of high‐quality program implementation for producing positive outcomes. A frequently acknowledged challenge in the implementation of school‐based interventions is that of fidelity monitoring and ensuring high fidelity program implementation (Vroom et al, 2020). Not only do the results from implementation fidelity measures used in the current study provide evidence that the SPARK Curriculum was delivered as intended, but their use in the current study also demonstrates the feasibility and utility of these measures as a tool for monitoring implementation fidelity of the SPARK Curriculum within the context of school‐based program delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their meta‐analysis of school‐based social and emotional learning programs, Durlak et al (2011) noted the importance of high‐quality program implementation for producing positive outcomes. A frequently acknowledged challenge in the implementation of school‐based interventions is that of fidelity monitoring and ensuring high fidelity program implementation (Vroom et al, 2020). Not only do the results from implementation fidelity measures used in the current study provide evidence that the SPARK Curriculum was delivered as intended, but their use in the current study also demonstrates the feasibility and utility of these measures as a tool for monitoring implementation fidelity of the SPARK Curriculum within the context of school‐based program delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that both individual and program factors were highlighted by children both as positive and negative aspects and, consequently, as aspects that could be further improved. Similarly, participant factors have been emphasized in other studies, such as attitudes toward learning and motivation, as well as program factors, such as length [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the quality of program implementation based on the indicators of feasibility and responsiveness is considered good practice [ 29 , 30 ] and an essential condition of effective social and emotional learning programs [ 31 , 32 ]) and ensures that quality has also been associated with the interventions’ outcomes [ 33 ]. When nuclear elements of fidelity were separately considered, participant responsiveness (i.e., involvement and engagement of children/adolescents) was significantly associated with SEL outcomes post-test [ 34 ]. Additionally, qualitative evaluations of program implementations can also inform about their quality and variability [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, early interventions that incorporate skills trainings have also shown promising effectiveness [4]. Evidence for this effectiveness primarily stems from life skills trainings embedded in school curricula [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], whereas life skills trainings to promote mental health and prevent substance use in young adolescents are only recently being adapted to digital interventions as well as being tested [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. This trend is mainly fostered by the difficulties that schools encounter when trying to implement life skills trainings in their curricula [9] and the personnel and financial resources that such programs require [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%