2006
DOI: 10.3892/or.16.3.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of hyperthermic chemotherapy on human gastric cancer cell lines: Preliminary results

Abstract: Abstract. In this preliminary study, we evaluated the impact of hyperthermia (HT) and hyperthermic chemotherapy (HTCT) on six human gastric cancer cell lines and explored the mechanisms of cell-killing effect under HTCT. Treatment conditions were categorized into 4 modes: i) normothermic control (NT), ii) HT, iii) normothermic chemotherapy (NTCT) and iv) HTCT. According to the data of MTT and LM observations, isolated HT only temporarily inhibited cell proliferation and had no cell-killing effect on gastric ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison is shown between the level of expression difference identified by qPCR vs. that identified in the array analysis in Table 1 with confirmation of 28 out of 32 genes, or ~88%. This rate of confirmation is consistent with our previous array analysis that used a similar approach to detect modest expression differences (Hashimoto and Wiren, 2008), and the confirmation rate is high relative to other array platforms and analytical approaches (see Treadwell et al, 2004, see Tang et al, 2006). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A comparison is shown between the level of expression difference identified by qPCR vs. that identified in the array analysis in Table 1 with confirmation of 28 out of 32 genes, or ~88%. This rate of confirmation is consistent with our previous array analysis that used a similar approach to detect modest expression differences (Hashimoto and Wiren, 2008), and the confirmation rate is high relative to other array platforms and analytical approaches (see Treadwell et al, 2004, see Tang et al, 2006). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We used an uncorrected P-value to decrease the chance of excluding EtOH-regulated transcripts (false negatives). Confirmation of differences by qRT-PCR analysis (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figure 2 in supporting information online) with samples derived from animals distinct from those employed for the microarray hybridizations indicated a percent positive that was consistent with reports in the literature using other array platforms and analytical approaches (see Tang et al, 2006;Treadwell and Singh, 2004). We selected genes for confirmation from pathways identified as influenced by withdrawal, particularly those involved in cell death and anti-inflammatory processes.…”
Section: Gene Expression Differences During Etoh Withdrawalsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Prior confirmation of expression differences identified by hybridization using qPCR was ~88% (Hashimoto et al, 2011), similar to our previous finding of an ~80% confirmation rate (Hashimoto and Wiren, 2008). This rate of confirmation is high relative to other array platforms and analytical approaches (see Treadwell and Singh, 2004, Tang et al, 2006). Overall, nearly 20% of genes examined demonstrated significant ethanol regulation during any time point in sex- and line-specific comparisons (819 of 4696 genes queried).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%