2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1304654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Human Capital on Regional Labor Productivity in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baccouche et al (2008) show for example that FDI spillovers can only be beneficial for companies with high absorption capacity, otherwise its effect remains negative. Similar results for the human capital are also found by Fischer et al (2009) using an aggregated regional data (198 European regions). Fischer et al (2009) use a spatial Durbin Model to estimate the direct and indirect impacts of human capital on regional labor productivity.…”
Section: The Conditional Maximum Likelihood Peer Group Effects Estimatorsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Baccouche et al (2008) show for example that FDI spillovers can only be beneficial for companies with high absorption capacity, otherwise its effect remains negative. Similar results for the human capital are also found by Fischer et al (2009) using an aggregated regional data (198 European regions). Fischer et al (2009) use a spatial Durbin Model to estimate the direct and indirect impacts of human capital on regional labor productivity.…”
Section: The Conditional Maximum Likelihood Peer Group Effects Estimatorsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar results for the human capital are also found by Fischer et al (2009) using an aggregated regional data (198 European regions). Fischer et al (2009) use a spatial Durbin Model to estimate the direct and indirect impacts of human capital on regional labor productivity. 9 They show that the indirect impact of human capital is significantly negative, while the average total impact (direct impact + indirect impact) is not different from zero.…”
Section: The Conditional Maximum Likelihood Peer Group Effects Estimatorsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the common factor restriction mentioned above, parameter restriction γ =− ρδ and μ =− ρβ should fail in the presence of omitted variables, rejecting the SEM specification. This restriction can be tested by first estimating a SDM as the unrestricted version of SEM, and then carrying out a likelihood ratio test of the spatial common factors (Burridge 1981; Fischer, et al. 2009).…”
Section: Estimation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we follow Fischer et al. () and measure human capital in terms of educational attainment based on data for the active population aged 15 years and older that attained the level of tertiary education, as defined by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics classes five and six. This variable is clearly imperfect: it completely ignores primary and secondary education, and on‐the‐job training, and does not account for the quality of education.…”
Section: Empirical Club Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%