2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Household Economics on Short-Term Outcomes in a Posterior Fossa Tumor Population

Abstract: Background Disparities exist in medical care and may result in avoidable negative clinical care outcomes for those affected. There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the impact of economic disparities on neurosurgical outcomes. Methods A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor resections, excluding cerebellopontine angle tumors, over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes evaluated i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a stepwise regression model, incorporating other recorded patient demographic variables, was used to identify potential confounders. For outcomes that had less than 5% of events occur (30-day reoperation and mortality), a Firth correction was applied to eliminate the small sample size bias This statistical analysis has previously been described by the present authors [ 1 , 5 , 13 ]. Significance for all analyses was set at a p-value < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, a stepwise regression model, incorporating other recorded patient demographic variables, was used to identify potential confounders. For outcomes that had less than 5% of events occur (30-day reoperation and mortality), a Firth correction was applied to eliminate the small sample size bias This statistical analysis has previously been described by the present authors [ 1 , 5 , 13 ]. Significance for all analyses was set at a p-value < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the surgical setting, SES has been previously demonstrated to predict postoperative outcomes across a wide range of populations. Within neurosurgery, previous studies have shown that low SES puts patients at risk for complications following multiple different procedures, from brain tumor resection to spinal surgery [ 1 - 5 ]. Given its broad impact, it, therefore, remains important to evaluate SES and identify outcome disparities in specific neurosurgical procedural populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serial studies were performed to assess the role of household income and disparities in outcomes following resection of meningiomas (n = 351), nonpituitary, nonmeningioma, parenchymal brain tumors (n = 1970), posterior fossa tumors (n = 283), and CPA tumors (n = 277) over a 6-yr period (June 7, 2013, through April 29, 2019). [41][42][43][44][45] For the purpose of isolating the impact of SES on outcomes, patients of differing SES were matched based on gender assigned at birth and race, among other key criteria. Analysis of the supratentorial brain tumor resection cohort found that postoperative mortality increases with decreasing income (Figure 4).…”
Section: Outcome Disparities Based On Patient Household Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 Escalating morbidity was shown with lower SES following resection of both meningiomas and CPA tumors. 42,44,45…”
Section: Outcome Disparities Based On Patient Household Incomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high rates of morbidity and surgical complications, the identification of SDOH that contribute to unfavorable outcomes following posterior fossa tumor resection is needed. Previous evidence in this population has confirmed that socioeconomic status contributes to adverse postsurgical events, but no studies yet have examined gender [ 21 ]. Here, we model the effects of gender on short-term and long-term outcomes across our broad population of posterior fossa tumor resection patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%