1995
DOI: 10.52324/001c.8969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Highway Investment on New Manufacturing Employment in South Carolina: A Small Regional Spatial Analysis

Abstract: A geographical information system (GIS) is used with econometric methods to develop a small region spatial model to analyze the linkage between highway investment and new manufacturing employment in South Carolina. OLS estimates of the spatial model indicate that increases in four-lane highways, as well as interstate access, and two-lane highway density stimulate new manufacturing firm employment. Regions with higher than average employment density (a proxy for agglomeration economies) consistently influence e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between transportation costs, housing costs, and economic activity has been discussed for many years, but coordination appears to be a significant challenge [60]. The results of this analysis add another dimension to the evidence about these relationships with a focus on household expenditures and regional consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The relationship between transportation costs, housing costs, and economic activity has been discussed for many years, but coordination appears to be a significant challenge [60]. The results of this analysis add another dimension to the evidence about these relationships with a focus on household expenditures and regional consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are fourteen studies in this category. Nine of the fourteen found a positive significant relationship between the measure of public transportation capital and the measure of economic benefit (Aschauer 1989c;Jones 1990;Mofidi and Stone 1990;Duffy-Deno and Eberts 1991;Coughlin, Terza, and Aromdee 1991;Luce 1994;Singletary et al 1995;Bruinsma, Rienstra, and Rietveld 1997;Haughwout 1999). Five (Reynolds and Maki 1990;Dalenberg and Partridge 1995;Crihfield and Panggabean 1995;Bollinger and Ihlanfeldt 1997;Haughwout 1999) of the fourteen found either no relationship or, in two cases (Dalenberg and Partridge 1995;Haughwout 1999), a negative relationship.…”
Section: ᭤ Reductions In Costs Of Productionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most detailed spatial disaggregation is reported in the paper by Singletary et al (1995). They split South Carolina into 477 zones.…”
Section: ᭤ Reductions In Costs Of Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Young and Matthews (2007) have argued that urban-centered theories on neoliberalism have overlooked the importance of rural resource economies and the role of transport in facilitating community development. In South Carolina, a study of the relationship between highway development and smallregion manufacturing employment raised questions about the importance of transport opportunities at the local and regional scales when planning industrial growth (Singletary et al, 1995). More research could be focused on policies that encourage rural industrial and manufacturing growth, in part because several studies have raised the issue of whether rural transport development projects linked to economic stimulus programs really are socially inclusive (see, for example, Leinbach, 2000;Woods, 2005;McDonagh, 2006).…”
Section: Connections: Accessibility and Mobility In Local Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%