2017
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of hemodynamic variability and signal mixing on the identifiability of effective connectivity structures in BOLD fMRI

Abstract: PurposeMultiple computational studies have demonstrated that essentially all current analytical approaches to determine effective connectivity perform poorly when applied to synthetic functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) datasets. In this study, we take a theoretical approach to investigate the potential factors facilitating and hindering effective connectivity research in fMRI.Materials and MethodsIn this work, we perform a simulation study with use of Dynamic Causal Modeling generative model in order… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the original atlas has twice higher spatial resolution than the HCP data, this 3D map was subsampled to 91 × 109 x 91 voxels. As known from previous computational studies, mixing signals within ROIs is very detrimental to the connectivity research in fMRI ( Smith et al., 2011 , Bielczyk et al., 2017a ). Therefore in case voxels within a given block of 2 × 2 x 2 voxels belonged to two or more separate ROIs from Wang's atlas, we did not assign any label to that block in the downsampled atlas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the original atlas has twice higher spatial resolution than the HCP data, this 3D map was subsampled to 91 × 109 x 91 voxels. As known from previous computational studies, mixing signals within ROIs is very detrimental to the connectivity research in fMRI ( Smith et al., 2011 , Bielczyk et al., 2017a ). Therefore in case voxels within a given block of 2 × 2 x 2 voxels belonged to two or more separate ROIs from Wang's atlas, we did not assign any label to that block in the downsampled atlas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…What is more, the hemodynamic response function (HRF) may well vary across regions (David et al, 2008; Handwerker, Ollinger, & D’Esposito, 2004), revealing spurious causal connections: when the HRF in one region is faster than in another, the temporal precedence of the peak will easily be mistaken for causation. The estimated directionality can in the worst case, even be reversed, when the region with the slower HRF in fact causes the region with the faster HRF (Bielczyk, et al, 2017). Furthermore, the BOLD signal might be noninvertible into the neuronal time series (Seth et al, 2015), which can affect GC analysis regardless of whether it is performed on the BOLD time series or the deconvolved signal.…”
Section: Network-wise Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemodynamic response thus acts as a low-pass filter, which results in high correlations between activity in consecutive frames (J. D. Ramsey et al, 2010). Since the hemodynamic lags (understood as the peaks of the hemodynamic response) are region- and subject-specific (Devonshire et al, 2012) and vary over time (Glomb, Ponce-Alvarez, Gilson, Ritter, & Deco, 2017), it is difficult to infer causality between two time series with potentially different hemodynamic lags (Bielczyk, Llera, Buitelaar, Glennon, & Beckmann, 2017). Computational work by Seth, Chorley, and Barnett (2013) suggests that upsampling the signal to low repetition times (TRs) (<0.1[ s ]) might potentially overcome this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) activity is delayed with respect to neuronal firing, with a delay of 3–6 s in the adult human brain (Arichi et al, 2012). The delayed hemodynamic response can also induce spurious cross-correlations between two BOLD time series (Ramsey et al, 2010; Bielczyk, Llera, Buitelaar, Glennon, & Beckmann, 2017). Both subject-to-subject and region-to-region variability in the shape of hemodynamic response (Devonshire et al, 2012) provide a general limitation to the methods for effective connectivity research in fMRI: when the hemodynamic response in one region is faster than in another, the temporal precedence of the peak of the hemodynamic response can easily be mistaken for causation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%