The impact of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning design features on the transmission of viruses, including the 2019 novel coronavirus: A systematic review of ventilation and coronavirus

Abstract

Aerosol transmission has been a pathway for the spread of many viruses. Similarly, emerging evidence has determined aerosol transmission for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the resulting COVID-19 pandemic to be significant. As such, data regarding the effect of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) features to control and mitigate virus transmission is essential. A systematic review was conducted to identify and comprehensively synthesize research examining the effectiveness of ventilation for mitigating transmission of coronaviruses. A comprehensive search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Compendex, Web of Science Core to January 2021. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed by two authors. Evidence tables were developed and results were described narratively. Results from 32 relevant studies showed that: increased ventilation rate was associated with decreased transmission, transmission probability/risk, infection probability/risk, droplet persistence, virus concentration, and increased virus removal and virus particle removal efficiency; increased ventilation rate decreased risk at longer exposure times; some ventilation was better than no ventilation; airflow patterns affected transmission; ventilation feature (e.g., supply/exhaust, fans) placement influenced particle distribution. Few studies provided specific quantitative ventilation parameters suggesting a significant gap in current research. Adapting HVAC ventilation systems to mitigate virus transmission is not a one-solution-fits-all approach. Changing ventilation rate or using mixing ventilation is not always the only way to mitigate and control viruses. Practitioners need to consider occupancy, ventilation feature (supply/exhaust and fans) placement, and exposure time in conjunction with both ventilation rates and airflow patterns. Some recommendations based on quantitative data were made for specific scenarios (e.g., using air change rate of 9 h-1 for a hospital ward). Other recommendations included using or increasing ventilation, introducing fresh air, using maximum supply rates, avoiding poorly ventilated spaces, assessing fan placement and potentially increasing ventilation locations, and employing ventilation testing and air balancing checks. Trial registration: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020193968.

Management of Health and Environment Issues Through Ventilation in Mining Lines: An Operational and Statistical Approach

“…Health outcome is directly linked ventilation efficacy. Poor ventilation is likely to cause respiratory illness as well worsen an already existing respiratory condition among mine workers [19,20]. The efficacy of ventilation not only affect the outcome of health but also that of the environment.…”

Evaluating airflow dynamics in common vertical circulation spaces of a multi-floor apartment building for mitigating airborne infection risks: A CFD modeling study

“…Research in this domain delves into the intricacies of ventilation systems, exploring the effectiveness of air exchange rates, filtration technologies, and airflow patterns in minimizing the concentration and spread of airborne pathogens [ [26] , [27] , [28] ]. Studies have investigated the role of natural ventilation, mechanical ventilation systems, and hybrid approaches, considering factors such as occupancy density, building layout, and climatic conditions [ 27 , 29 ]. Simultaneously, a parallel body of research has focused on the architectural design of interior spaces to maximize natural ventilation [ 30 ].…”

Ambient Carbon Dioxide Concentration Correlates with SARS-CoV-2 Aerostability and Infection Risk

“…For example, changing aerosol production rates (e.g. via singing or talking) (5,6), crowding/social distancing policies (7), mask wearing (8), and improved ventilation (9) all reduce the total number of virus-containing aerosol droplets. The viral load within aerosol droplets may also be altered, so that the infectivity of the viral particles themselves is changed through processes such as UV germicidal irradiation (10) or by adjustments to environmental conditions such as relative humidity (RH) (11) or temperature (12).…”