An educational program introducing high school STEM students to iterative design, controlled failure, and the experimental method enhanced student engagement, performance, and perceptions of STEM education and careers.
AbstractThe multi-disciplinary nature of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers often renders difficulty for high school students navigating from classroom knowledge to post-secondary pursuits. Discrepancies between the knowledge-based high school learning approach and the experiential approach of undergraduate studies leaves some students disillusioned by STEM. We present Discovery, an inquiry-focused learning model delivered by STEM graduate students in collaboration with high school educators, in the context of biomedical engineering. High school STEM students of diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds engaged in iterative, problem-based learning designed to emphasize critical thinking in an iterative manner within the secondary school and university environments. Assessment of grades and survey data suggested positive impact on students' STEM pursuits, notably in under-performing and repeating student cohorts. Discovery presents a scalable platform blurring the divide between secondary and post-secondary learning, providing valuable learning opportunities and capturing cohorts of students that might otherwise be under-engaged in STEM.High school students with diverse STEM interests considering post-secondary options are often challenged by a limited understanding of the multi-disciplinary nature of many careers, such as the vast array of health-care related opportunities. The rapidly growing field of biomedical engineering (BME) is appealing because one can integrate fundamental concepts from electrical, mechanical, and chemical engineering into biology-based disciplines such as medicine and the life sciences; these options are attractive to high school students who are enthusiastic to have impact in the field of health care, particularly if given sufficient introduction and exposure (1). However, there is known discrepancy between the knowledge-based learning approach common in high schools and the experiential, mastery-based approaches afforded by the undergraduate model (2). In the latter, focused classes, interdisciplinary