2013
DOI: 10.3233/npm-1363312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of group B Streptococcus prophylaxis on early onset neonatal infections

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To determine if changes have occurred in the causative pathogens and/or antibiotic susceptibility profiles in early onset neonatal infections since initiation of group B Streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis and to determine risk factors for ampicillin/penicillin resistant microorganisms. STUDY DESIGN: Data on 220 infants with positive blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid cultures for bacteria or fungi at ≤seven days of age from 1990-2007 were examined and divided into three epochs, based on intrapartum an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether or not IAP alters infection rates of other pathogens or increases GBS antibiotic resistance remains unclear. Some studies have alerted to the possibility of negative IAP effects including increased infections with Gram-negative bacteria such as ampicillin-resistant E. coli ( 228 , 229 ), whereas others have not ( 230 ). A recent epidemiological study found an increase in GBS LOD from 1997–2001 to 2002–2010, but it is not known whether this is due to a shift in GBS pathogenicity, or due to an increase in survival of preterm infants, or delay in disease onset from IAP ( 226 ).…”
Section: Potential Unintended Consequences Of Iapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not IAP alters infection rates of other pathogens or increases GBS antibiotic resistance remains unclear. Some studies have alerted to the possibility of negative IAP effects including increased infections with Gram-negative bacteria such as ampicillin-resistant E. coli ( 228 , 229 ), whereas others have not ( 230 ). A recent epidemiological study found an increase in GBS LOD from 1997–2001 to 2002–2010, but it is not known whether this is due to a shift in GBS pathogenicity, or due to an increase in survival of preterm infants, or delay in disease onset from IAP ( 226 ).…”
Section: Potential Unintended Consequences Of Iapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the guidelines for prevention of perinatal GBS disease with universal antenatal screening and/or intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for culturepositive and high-risk pregnant women, the incidence of neonatal EOD has significantly declined. 3,4 However, there is a substantial variability of GBS incidence rates worldwide; in several countries GBS disease affects a significant number of infants, while in others GBS burden remains low. 5-8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ampicillin is a beta-lactam antibiotic frequently used to treat early and late-onset neonatal sepsis [ 248 , 249 ]. Li and Xie developed a PBPK model of ampicillin in neonates and pregnant women during the intrapartum period and indicated that 50 mg/kg ampicillin q8h was effective and safe for newborns, and that 1 g of ampicillin was adequate for intrapartum prophylaxis [ 188 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%