2021
DOI: 10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i730615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Groundwater Irrigation Development on Cropping Intensity and Crop Productivity in Krishnagiri District

Abstract: Aims: The study is done with the objective of assessing the impact of groundwater irrigation development on cropping intensity and crop productivity in Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu, India. Study Design: Purposive random sampling Place and Duration of Study: Krishnagiri district, Tamil Nadu, India during 2019-20. Methodology: The data on irrigation sources and area under various irrigation sources in Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu and India is subjected to growth analysis using trend studies and CAGR (Com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various other research studies done in different regions of the world have also proved that FLDs have in the real sense resulted in increase in yields of the farming communities. The increase in yield under FLDs of different crops has also been reported by Haque (2000) [1] , Naberia et.al, (2015) [4] and Raj Kumar et.al (2024) [3] . The increased yields have also augmented the income of farming communities leading to their socio-economic empowerment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Various other research studies done in different regions of the world have also proved that FLDs have in the real sense resulted in increase in yields of the farming communities. The increase in yield under FLDs of different crops has also been reported by Haque (2000) [1] , Naberia et.al, (2015) [4] and Raj Kumar et.al (2024) [3] . The increased yields have also augmented the income of farming communities leading to their socio-economic empowerment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%