2016
DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Government Debt, Expenditure and Taxes on Aggregate Investment and Productivity Growth

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate empirically the impact of fiscal policy on two key determinants\ud of long-term growth, i.e., private investment and productivity growth. We mostly focus on a\ud panel of 20 OECD economies from 1970 to 2009, although we also present some estimates based\ud on data for 80 developing economies. Our findings suggest that high public debt adversely\ud affects both aggregate investment spending and productivity growth, through distortions related\ud to the size of the public sector. We als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the theoretical literature finds that there is cause to take into account the effects of very high debt on capital stock and growth, since it tends to point to a negative link between the public debt-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio and the steady-state growth rate of GDP (see, for instance, Aizenman et al, 2007). The conventional view is that while debt can stimulate aggregate demand and output in the short run [see Barro (1990) or Elmendorf and Mankiw (1999)], in the long run it may crowd out capital and reduce output (Salotti and Trecroci, 2016). Moreover, the literature provides a variety of reasons to explain why the higher the level of public debt, the more negative its effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the theoretical literature finds that there is cause to take into account the effects of very high debt on capital stock and growth, since it tends to point to a negative link between the public debt-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio and the steady-state growth rate of GDP (see, for instance, Aizenman et al, 2007). The conventional view is that while debt can stimulate aggregate demand and output in the short run [see Barro (1990) or Elmendorf and Mankiw (1999)], in the long run it may crowd out capital and reduce output (Salotti and Trecroci, 2016). Moreover, the literature provides a variety of reasons to explain why the higher the level of public debt, the more negative its effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to evolve a financial crisis from a crisis of confidence. Most scholars agree with their view that there is indeed a critical value between them, and the marginal economic growth effect of high debt levels is negative above this threshold [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. However, they questioned the specific threshold of 90% in RR.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Salotti & Trecroci [19] investigated the impact of government debt, expenditure and taxes on aggregate investment and productivity growth in OECD for the period 1970 to 2009. The study employed the panel fixed effect estimation method as well as the generalized method of moments.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%