The Impact of Giving Remissions on Criminal Acts of Corruption in Sociological Perspective

Abstract

This study aims to find out the reasons for the government to make a policy of granting remissions to corrupt convicts and analyze the impact of granting remissions to corrupt convicts from a sociological perspective. This type of research is a field. The approach used is empirical data collection techniques through in-depth interviews with informants directly without going through intermediary media, which are directly analyzed through qualitative methods. This study indicates that the government's aim in implementing the policy of granting remissions is to reduce overcapacity and foster prisoners to become better human beings. In addition, the impact of granting remissions to corrupt convicts does not affect eradicating corruption.

Enforcement of Corruption Criminal Laws (TIPIKOR) in the Perspective of Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes

“…46 of 2009 concerning Defilement Wrongdoing Courts, is expected to accelerate the legal cycle in debasement cases. [7] Aside from the obligations of the police and examiner's office, the establishment that additionally has the errand of doing examinations concerning criminal demonstrations of defilement is the Debasement Wrongdoing Destruction Commission (KPK) as directed in Article 6 sub c of Regulation no. 30 of 2002 that: The Debasement Destruction Commission completes requests, examinations and indictments of criminal demonstrations of defilement; The Defilement Destruction Council (KPK) even has the position to assume control over the examination or arraignment of culprits of criminal demonstrations of debasement that are being done by the police or examiner's office, assuming that there are legitimate reasons as made sense of in Article 9 of Regulation no.…”

Confiscation of Asset Proceedings from Corruptor Money Laundering for the Use of Legal Action in Returning Loss of State Property

“…5 of 2014 on Extra Criminal Remuneration Cash for Debasement Wrongdoings. [6] Compensation for debasement related violations is determined in view of the all out worth of the property got because of the offense, not just the complete misfortune to the state. Notwithstanding, it is likewise expressed that the lawbreaker will confront extra detainment assuming his resources are inadequate and his property is seized assuming that he can't make remuneration.…”

The Effectiveness of the Prosecutor's Role in Enforcing Corruption Criminal Laws

“…20 of 2001 are represented by the Indonesian Government. 14 of 2005 concerning Philosophy for Limiting State/Neighborhood Receivables.Based on KEP-518/J.A/11/2001, dated November 1, 2001, the following steps are taken to settle replacement money that has permanent legal force:[9] : a. A summons (D-1) will be given with the case for swap cash for the convict to show up before the executing lawyer at the neighborhood investigator's office; b.…”