Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2022.102906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of functional load and cumulative errors on listeners' judgments of comprehensibility and accentedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general comprehensibility of pronunciations with high FL vowel conflations is 0.210 (calculated by dividing the number of correct transcriptions by the total number of segmental errors), and a much lower number can be found when it comes to low FL vowel conflations (0.448). This number is consistent with the findings of previous research, reflecting that high FL errors are associated with greater loss of comprehensibility than low FL errors [8]. 4 lists all the vowel conflations that occurred in the participants' performances into high or low FL category and ranks them in order of occurrence.…”
Section: Results Of Task 2 and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general comprehensibility of pronunciations with high FL vowel conflations is 0.210 (calculated by dividing the number of correct transcriptions by the total number of segmental errors), and a much lower number can be found when it comes to low FL vowel conflations (0.448). This number is consistent with the findings of previous research, reflecting that high FL errors are associated with greater loss of comprehensibility than low FL errors [8]. 4 lists all the vowel conflations that occurred in the participants' performances into high or low FL category and ranks them in order of occurrence.…”
Section: Results Of Task 2 and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For accentedness judgments, higher error frequency affected high FL errors only. The results confirm earlier findings for the usefulness of functional load as a metric for L2 pronunciation teaching, but raise questions about whether findings for extremes on the 10-point FL hierarchy reflect error gravity findings for the middle of the hierarchy [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%