The impact of ‘framing’ in the adoption of GM crops

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) crops offer significant advantages in our crop improvement programs because they are created using a more targeted approach which is not possible in traditional breeding methods. Human benefit is one of the main objectives of crop improvement but the legal framework for the introduction of GM crops and the depiction and portrayal of GM crops in the media create barriers to these benefits. This article attempts to highlight the barriers to GM crop adoption particularly focusing on the idea of “framing” and the way GM technology is framed in the media. The resulting public health, economic, and ecological concerns about genetically modified plants, along with the reality of these misconceptions, are discussed with specific examples. Finally, we propose potential routes toward increased acceptance of GM crops.

The recent genetic modification techniques for improve soil conservation, nutrient uptake and utilization

“…Furthermore, the ownership and control of GMO seeds and crops raises ethical questions that are referred to as “biopiracy.” 107 , 108 Biotechnology companies’ patenting of GMOs raises concerns about corporate monopolies in the agricultural sector and access to agricultural resources. 109 , 113 Moreover, worries exist regarding genetic modification’s long-term effects on the environment, such as the possibility of inadvertent damage to non-target species, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem biodiversity. 114–116 Overall, even though GM technology shows promise in solving certain agricultural problems, its application must be carefully considered and its ethical and environmental implications addressed to achieve fair and sustainable results.…”