Abstract:Aims:
To examine the impact of frailty on treatment outcomes for overactive bladder (OAB) in older adults starting pharmacotherapy, onabotulinumtoximA, and sacral neuromodulation.
Methods:
This is a prospective study of men and women age ≥60 years starting pharmacotherapy, onabotulinumtoxinA, or sacral neuromodulation. Subjects were administered questionnaires at baseline and again at 1- and 3-months. Frailty was assessed at baseline using the timed up and go test (TUGT), whereby a TUGT time of ≥12 seconds w… Show more
“…We also found no differences in implantation based on time to PD diagnosis or PD disease severity based on NHY staging which is similar to the findings in the study by Greenberg et al 17 This is in keeping with literature suggesting that frailty does not preclude treatment success with third‐line therapies 28 …”
Introduction and Objective
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second‐most common degenerative neurologic disease worldwide. Overactive bladder (OAB) is prevalent in this population but can be challenging to treat. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an attractive option but remains understudied. We have utilized SNM in PD patients and herein describe our outcomes.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of PD patients who underwent peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) or Stage 1 SNM from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was progression to a permanent implant. The impact of PD stage and preprocedural urodynamic (UDS) parameters on test‐phase outcome were investigated. Long‐term efficacy was assessed using Wilcoxon matched‐pairs test looking at a change in urinary symptoms (frequency, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and pad use) documented at follow‐up visits and further need for treatment.
Results
Thirty‐four patients underwent test phase SNM (7 PNE and 27 Stage 1). Median follow‐up was 11 (interquartile range 5.8–29.8) months. Indications included refractory OAB (30/34) and nonobstructive urinary retention (4/34). Overall, 82% (28/34) of patients proceeded to a permanent implant. 71% (5/7) of PNEs were successful. Test‐phase success did not differ based on PD disease severity or UDS parameters. In patients with OAB/urgency incontinence who progressed to the permanent implant, there was a statistically significant improvement in their urinary symptoms from baseline. Most (68%) patients were able to discontinue OAB medications post‐implant. The overall lead revision rate was 14% (4/28) and 3 devices required removal.
Conclusions
SNM is an efficacious treatment option for PD patients with a high percentage of patients having improvement in their urinary symptoms.
“…We also found no differences in implantation based on time to PD diagnosis or PD disease severity based on NHY staging which is similar to the findings in the study by Greenberg et al 17 This is in keeping with literature suggesting that frailty does not preclude treatment success with third‐line therapies 28 …”
Introduction and Objective
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second‐most common degenerative neurologic disease worldwide. Overactive bladder (OAB) is prevalent in this population but can be challenging to treat. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an attractive option but remains understudied. We have utilized SNM in PD patients and herein describe our outcomes.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of PD patients who underwent peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) or Stage 1 SNM from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was progression to a permanent implant. The impact of PD stage and preprocedural urodynamic (UDS) parameters on test‐phase outcome were investigated. Long‐term efficacy was assessed using Wilcoxon matched‐pairs test looking at a change in urinary symptoms (frequency, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and pad use) documented at follow‐up visits and further need for treatment.
Results
Thirty‐four patients underwent test phase SNM (7 PNE and 27 Stage 1). Median follow‐up was 11 (interquartile range 5.8–29.8) months. Indications included refractory OAB (30/34) and nonobstructive urinary retention (4/34). Overall, 82% (28/34) of patients proceeded to a permanent implant. 71% (5/7) of PNEs were successful. Test‐phase success did not differ based on PD disease severity or UDS parameters. In patients with OAB/urgency incontinence who progressed to the permanent implant, there was a statistically significant improvement in their urinary symptoms from baseline. Most (68%) patients were able to discontinue OAB medications post‐implant. The overall lead revision rate was 14% (4/28) and 3 devices required removal.
Conclusions
SNM is an efficacious treatment option for PD patients with a high percentage of patients having improvement in their urinary symptoms.
“…Post void residual greater than 150 mL after treatment was significantly higher in the frail (defined as meeting 3 or more of the following criteria: unintentional weight loss, selfreported exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and/or low physical activity) elderly (defined as older than 65 years) group compared to the elderly without frailty or younger than 65 groups and success rate was significantly lower compared to the other two groups [75]. Conversely, a prospective study assessing impact of frailty (defined as baseline time up and go test ≥ 12 seconds) on treatment of OAB in men and women 60 years of age or older noted that frail subjects starting pharmacotherapy or undergoing on botulinum toxin A or sacral neuromodulation demonstrated improved OAB symptoms without statistically significant differences between groups when assessing OAB questionnaire responses, side effects, or adverse events [76].…”
Risk of urinary incontinence (UI) increases with age and can have detrimental effects on patients and caregivers. UI should not be considered a normal part of aging and warrants a comprehensive evaluation. Treatment of UI in the aging male requires special consideration, particularly when it comes to comorbid conditions and potential side effects of intervention. The aim of this review is to discuss the evaluation of, risk factors for, and management of UI in the aging male.
“…The mean age was 70.3 years. There was a significant improvement in patient‐reported outcomes with no difference based on frailty across therapies 28 . The study did not evaluate adverse side effect rates specific to BTX‐A.…”
Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) disproportionally affects older adults in both incidence and severity. OAB pharmacotherapy is often problematic in the elderly due to polypharmacy, adverse side effect profiles and contraindications in the setting of multiple comorbidities, and concerns regarding the risk of incident dementia with anticholinergic use. The burden of OAB in older patients coupled with concerns surrounding pharmacotherapy options should motivate optimization of nonpharmacologic therapies in this population. At the same time, several aspects of aging may impact treatment efficacy and decision-making. This narrative review critically summarizes current evidence regarding third-line OAB therapy use in the elderly and discusses nuances and treatment considerations specific to the population. Methods: We performed an extensive, nonsystematic evidence assessment of available literature via PubMed on onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A), sacral neuromodulation, and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for OAB, with a focus on study in elderly and frail populations.Results: While limited, available studies show all three third-line therapies are efficacious in older populations and there is no data to support one option over another. BTX-A likely has a higher risk of urinary tract infection and retention in older compared to younger populations, especially in the frail elderly. PTNS incurs the lowest risk, although adherence is poor, largely due to logistical burdens.
Conclusion:Advanced age and frailty should not preclude third-line therapy for refractory OAB, as available data support their efficacy and safety in these populations. Ultimately, treatment choices should be individualized and involve shared decision-making.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.