2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8040291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Forest Density on Forest Height Inversion Modeling from Polarimetric InSAR Data

Abstract: Forest height is of great significance in analyzing the carbon cycle on a global or a local scale and in reconstructing the accurate forest underlying terrain. Major algorithms for estimating forest height, such as the three-stage inversion process, are depending on the random-volume-over-ground (RVoG) model. However, the RVoG model is characterized by a lot of parameters, which influence its applicability in forest height retrieval. Forest density, as an important biophysical parameter, is one of those main i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, this cannot meet the RVoG assumption and may induce biases of ground phase estimated by the three-stage inversion procedure [23]. Nonetheless, the biases may be small and acceptable forest height results have been successfully extracted using the RVoG assumption at P band over the tropical and pine forests [24][25][26][27]. Hence, in this paper, the volume scattering contribution is still assumed to be polarization-independent for the GVB model.…”
Section: Coherence Locus Of Gvbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, this cannot meet the RVoG assumption and may induce biases of ground phase estimated by the three-stage inversion procedure [23]. Nonetheless, the biases may be small and acceptable forest height results have been successfully extracted using the RVoG assumption at P band over the tropical and pine forests [24][25][26][27]. Hence, in this paper, the volume scattering contribution is still assumed to be polarization-independent for the GVB model.…”
Section: Coherence Locus Of Gvbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the six-dimensional nonlinear optimization method, this method can avoid significant biases caused by the unreliable initial values of forest parameters. Moreover, in comparison to the three-stage method, the proposed method can provide more accurate pure volume coherence because it is free from the assumption that there is one polarization whose ground-to-volume power ratio should be less than −10 dB [10], which cannot be fulfilled for the low-frequency PolInSAR data or for the sparse forest [31]. In addition, only one polarimetric observation is used to calculate the pure volume coherence in the three-stage method.…”
Section: The Determination Of Initial Values Of Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherence-Amplitude conversion RVoG (height), [236,238] WCM (AGB), [237] Hybrid Neural Networks (LAI), [235] Similar modelling approaches are available based on SAR remote-sensing data. SAR-based empirical modelling approaches are conceptually the same as for optical data and make use of the backscatter, coherence or polarization information of the processed microwave signal as explained in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Physical Vs Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to optical RS, SAR-based physical models are more related to the vertical structure of vegetation and, hence, provide a more direct approach for modelling parameters of the global carbon budget, e.g., AGB. The most widely used microwave scattering models for forest stands are the Random Volume over Ground (RVoG, [236] and the Water Cloud Model (WCM, [237]) and a number of adaptations [238].…”
Section: Physical Vs Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%