2017
DOI: 10.4335/15.3.685-703(2017)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Local Economic Development in Montenegro

Abstract: The goal of the paper is to determine the extent to which local governments in Montenegro have managed to direct their increasing fiscal autonomy towards supporting local economic development. Our analysis of local business support programmes has shown that local governments have space to improve their business environments and business support programmes. Econometric analysis of data for 21 municipalities for 2007-2014 period, showed that the increase of own-source and shared revenues has a positive impact on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends have been seen in the former Yugoslav republics. Montenegro allowed municipalities to levy and collect property taxes at rates within a defined range (Kaluðerović, 2017). Croatia and Serbia have decentralized property tax administration.…”
Section: Property Tax In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar trends have been seen in the former Yugoslav republics. Montenegro allowed municipalities to levy and collect property taxes at rates within a defined range (Kaluðerović, 2017). Croatia and Serbia have decentralized property tax administration.…”
Section: Property Tax In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service quality improvement is perceived as the top advantage of the analysis, followed by innovation in the investment program. That is why the local government efforts aimed at providing support to private sectors investment such as establishing business zones and stimulating policies in the domain of own-source taxes, fees, and charges (in particular local governments) [19].…”
Section: B On Executive Legislative Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%