2017
DOI: 10.1002/jid.3309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Fiscal Consolidation on Human Development

Abstract: We find that fiscal austerity is associated with a reduction of human development standards, with the negative effect being particularly severe in the case of spending‐driven consolidation episodes. Fiscal adjustments are especially damaging for human development in developing countries (namely, African and Latin American countries). Additionally, the empirical evidence shows that (i) government stability is a crucial institutional determinant of human development, and (ii) while investment in physical capital… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates inefficiencies in budget allocation or challenges in translating budgetary funds into tangible human development outcomes. Corroborating with this finding, Agnello et al (2017) and Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) both find that fiscal austerity and government stability are crucial factors in determining the impact of government spending on HDI. While Agnello et al (2017) highlights the negative effect of spending-driven fiscal consolidation on HDI, Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) emphasizes the potential positive influence of government spending on HDI, particularly in the educational dimension.…”
Section: Table 3 System Gmm Vs Difference Gmm Estimationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates inefficiencies in budget allocation or challenges in translating budgetary funds into tangible human development outcomes. Corroborating with this finding, Agnello et al (2017) and Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) both find that fiscal austerity and government stability are crucial factors in determining the impact of government spending on HDI. While Agnello et al (2017) highlights the negative effect of spending-driven fiscal consolidation on HDI, Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) emphasizes the potential positive influence of government spending on HDI, particularly in the educational dimension.…”
Section: Table 3 System Gmm Vs Difference Gmm Estimationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Corroborating with this finding, Agnello et al (2017) and Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) both find that fiscal austerity and government stability are crucial factors in determining the impact of government spending on HDI. While Agnello et al (2017) highlights the negative effect of spending-driven fiscal consolidation on HDI, Rahmawati and Nur Intan (2020) emphasizes the potential positive influence of government spending on HDI, particularly in the educational dimension. Maharda and Aulia (2020) further supports this, finding a significant positive association between government expenditure on education and HDI in Indonesia.…”
Section: Table 3 System Gmm Vs Difference Gmm Estimationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies, for example Barro () and Dauda (), reported a positive and significant relationship between education and economic growth. A slightly different study by Agnello, Castro, Jalles, and Sousa (), showed that fiscal consolidation is significantly associated with a reduction in human development standards in developing countries, and more especially in Africa and Latin America.…”
Section: Survey Of Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Academic research has been conducted on austerity; however, very little analysis has been made on its effect on development, particularly in South Africa. A study by Agnello et al (2018) reviewed the effects of fiscal consolidation on human development in 71 countries. The paper found that fiscal austerity was associated with a reduction of 1 Compared to other BRICS economies with the exclusion of Brazil (15.6%), China (44.4%), India (30.6%), and Russia (24%) invest more in their infrastructure than South Africa (18.5%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%