2022
DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-008-4_146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Firm Size and Market Concentration on Firm Productivity

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of firm size and market concentration on firm productivity in Indonesian manufacturing. Firm size has been enduring interest in studies on firm productivity as the impact can be positive or negative. On the other hand, market concentration has increasingly been a key concern in evaluating firm productivity. This study used firm-level panel data of 6,783 manufacturing firms (47,481 observations) across 33 provinces of Indonesia. Two methods were applied in estimating the data;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that SIZE has a significantly negative effect on Tax Avoidance, rejecting H4. These findings align with research by Julianty et al (2023), Suyanto et al (2022), and Maulana et al (2018, suggesting that the maturity level of a company, regardless of its size, makes it more reliable to financial institutions and more likely to meet its financial needs, reducing the tendency to engage in tax avoidance. The last variable is LEV, and the results indicate that the LEV control variable does not have a significantly negative effect on tax avoidance, with a value of 0.807, leading to the rejection of H5.…”
Section: Control Variablessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This indicates that SIZE has a significantly negative effect on Tax Avoidance, rejecting H4. These findings align with research by Julianty et al (2023), Suyanto et al (2022), and Maulana et al (2018, suggesting that the maturity level of a company, regardless of its size, makes it more reliable to financial institutions and more likely to meet its financial needs, reducing the tendency to engage in tax avoidance. The last variable is LEV, and the results indicate that the LEV control variable does not have a significantly negative effect on tax avoidance, with a value of 0.807, leading to the rejection of H5.…”
Section: Control Variablessupporting
confidence: 89%