2016
DOI: 10.15580/gjss.2016.4.110116199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Federal Government Expenditure on Economic Growth in Nigeria (1981-2014)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies had been carried out on the relationship between government spending and economic growth in Nigeria. For instance, Kareem et al [10]; Ukwureze [11]; Njoku et al [12]; Omo and Bashir [13]; Ogbuagu and Ekpenyong [14]; Shuaib et al [15]; Udoffia and Godson [16]; Olayemi [17]; Obialor [18]; Nwankwo et al [19]; Nwoha et al [20] and others. They had varying results and findings on the effect of government expenditures on economic growth in Nigeria had been a mixed bag.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies had been carried out on the relationship between government spending and economic growth in Nigeria. For instance, Kareem et al [10]; Ukwureze [11]; Njoku et al [12]; Omo and Bashir [13]; Ogbuagu and Ekpenyong [14]; Shuaib et al [15]; Udoffia and Godson [16]; Olayemi [17]; Obialor [18]; Nwankwo et al [19]; Nwoha et al [20] and others. They had varying results and findings on the effect of government expenditures on economic growth in Nigeria had been a mixed bag.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Udoffia and Godson [16] analyzed the impact of federal government expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria for the period 1981 to 2014. Real gross domestic product served as the proxy for economic growth and it served as the dependent variable while recurrent expenditure and capital expenditure served as federal government expenditure and these served as the independent variables.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used in this study was adapted from Akonji et al, (2013) and Udoffia and Godson's (2016) studies in an attempt to replicate their efforts to test Wagner's Law and test the true empirical state of the Keynesian theory on connectivity between the variables employed in the study.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical findings of the effects of federal government expenditures on growth in the Nigerian context have been mixed and inconsistent. In relation to the issues already raised, extant studies, such as Njoku et al (2014), Udoffia and Godson (2016), Akonji et al (2013) and many others reported that recurrent expenditure impacts growth positively in Nigeria, while the findings of studies, such as Aigheyisi (2013) and Ayinde et al (2015) suggested otherwise. In fact, by confirming the inconsistencies among extant studies, Ayinde et al (2015) suggested a further re-evaluation and reassessment of the direction of causal impact between recurrent expenditure and economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result shows that, community and social services has a positive and significant effect on the Nigeria's national income. Similarly, (Udoffia and Godson 2016) examined the impact of federal government expenditure on economic growth from 1980 to 2014; employing regression analysis on capital expenditure; recurrent expenditure and real gross domestic product in Nigeria, capital and recurrent expenditure have positive effect on real gross domestic product. (Bol & Willy, 2016) used public expenditure, infrastructure, production, social services and security as variables to know the relationship between public expenditure and economic growth in South Sudan from 2006 to 2014 with Random effect model.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%