1989
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/13.4.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Federal and State Income Taxes on Timber Income in the South Following the 1986 Tax Reform Act

Abstract: The 1988 federal and state income tax liabilities for hypothetical forest landowners in two federal income tax brackets, each with and without timber sale revenue, were calculated for the 14 southern states. At the medium income level, the state portion of total income tax liability(without timber sale revenue) ranges from 9% in Louisiana to 20% in North Carolina. With timber sale revenue, it ranges from 7% in Louisiana to 17% in North Carolina. At the high income level, the state portion of total income taxes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was an enormous subsidy to the industry that disproportionatley benefited the largest firms, which owned the vast majority of industry timberland (Sunley ). The Tax Reform Act of 1986 changed the rules governing taxable income of long‐term capital gains for timberland (Bettinger, Haney, and Siegal ). As a result, income from timberland was taxed twice: once at the level of corporate income (35 percent) and once at the stockholder level when dividends are disbursed (15 percent) (Hickman ).…”
Section: The Financialization Of the Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was an enormous subsidy to the industry that disproportionatley benefited the largest firms, which owned the vast majority of industry timberland (Sunley ). The Tax Reform Act of 1986 changed the rules governing taxable income of long‐term capital gains for timberland (Bettinger, Haney, and Siegal ). As a result, income from timberland was taxed twice: once at the level of corporate income (35 percent) and once at the stockholder level when dividends are disbursed (15 percent) (Hickman ).…”
Section: The Financialization Of the Statementioning
confidence: 99%