2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of facilities and service-based competition on internet services provision in the Canadian broadband market

Abstract: A variety of studies have focused on the effect of competition in broadband markets on increasing broadband penetration rates. Few studies however have focused on the extent to which competition also results in innovation in the marketplace, as demonstrated by increased broadband speeds, and other improvements that provide value to broadband users. This paper considers the effectiveness of market competition as a means of encouraging broadband providers to offer innovative services that meet citizens' increasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incumbent telephone companies compete with incumbent cable companies to provide broadband services, and wholesale regulations require these companies to make their fixed line infrastructure (described as 'last mile' connections) service using the Bell or Telus copper DSL network, or the Rogers or Shaw cable network, rather than building its own networks). While Canada was one of the first countries to devise a wholesale access regime, previous studies suggest that relatively high regulated wholesale prices, and hesitation by the CRTC in application of the rules restricted the ability of non-incumbent Internet service providers to become effective competitors (Berkman Center, 2010;van Gorp & Middleton, 2010). Recent changes to the wholesale regulatory environment are making it somewhat easier for non-incumbents to develop competitive offerings but the regional duopolies of copper telephone and cable broadband operators still dominate the Canadian residential and business markets for Internet access services, with a 92% and 68% share of respective market revenues (CRTC, 2013).…”
Section: Access Regulation and Rural Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incumbent telephone companies compete with incumbent cable companies to provide broadband services, and wholesale regulations require these companies to make their fixed line infrastructure (described as 'last mile' connections) service using the Bell or Telus copper DSL network, or the Rogers or Shaw cable network, rather than building its own networks). While Canada was one of the first countries to devise a wholesale access regime, previous studies suggest that relatively high regulated wholesale prices, and hesitation by the CRTC in application of the rules restricted the ability of non-incumbent Internet service providers to become effective competitors (Berkman Center, 2010;van Gorp & Middleton, 2010). Recent changes to the wholesale regulatory environment are making it somewhat easier for non-incumbents to develop competitive offerings but the regional duopolies of copper telephone and cable broadband operators still dominate the Canadian residential and business markets for Internet access services, with a 92% and 68% share of respective market revenues (CRTC, 2013).…”
Section: Access Regulation and Rural Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Berkman Center report describes Canada's unbundling policies as 'weakly implemented.' van Gorp and Middleton (2010) conclude that Canada's facilities-based competitive environment has not resulted in effective competition (defined by the ACCC as allowing competitors to hold 'a reasonably sustainable market position', Australian Competition & Consumer Commission 2009).…”
Section: Broadbandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike us, they don't model price or quality setting by the content providers and, so, do not consider the effect download caps have on those choices. Beyond the Dai and Jordan articles, the academic literature on download caps appears limited and focused on legal and regulatory issues (see, e.g., Van Gorp and Middleton, 2010). 9 In this regard, we note that, until recently, the Canadian ISP Rogers, which offers many plans, only offered plans with download caps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%