Abstract:The article highlights international dimensions of the emergence and transformation of migration policies in Turkey from the early 2000s onwards, including the context of the Syrian displacement, which made Turkey the top refugee hosting country in the world. While the transformation of migration governance in Turkey has widely been discussed, the effects of externalization on Turkey have remained focused on foreign policy and Turkey-EU relations. Only recently has the research explored the socio-legal implica… Show more
“…This population is detainable in Turkey in part because they are perceived as a threat in Europe. To challenge immigration detention in Turkey it is, therefore, necessary to address the exclusionary logic of externalisation which governs multi-faceted levels of 'precarious inclusion' (Rytter and Ghandchi 2020) into Turkish society (Baban, Ilcan, and Rygiel 2017;Üstübici 2019).…”
Section: Discussion: Barriers To the Abolition Of Immigration Detentimentioning
“…This population is detainable in Turkey in part because they are perceived as a threat in Europe. To challenge immigration detention in Turkey it is, therefore, necessary to address the exclusionary logic of externalisation which governs multi-faceted levels of 'precarious inclusion' (Rytter and Ghandchi 2020) into Turkish society (Baban, Ilcan, and Rygiel 2017;Üstübici 2019).…”
Section: Discussion: Barriers To the Abolition Of Immigration Detentimentioning
“…According to Akgündüz et al (2015), the inflow of this large number of refugees raised housing and food prices, leaving the employment rates of natives largely unaffected. This was due to the refugees entering to a large extent the informal labour market, thereby depressing wages and working conditions in this already precarious segment of the labour market (Caro, 2020;Tören, 2018;Üstübici, 2019).…”
Section: Methodology and Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
This paper is on migration and migration policy transition of Turkey. The focus is on the Turkish National Development Plans from the 1960s until today and the socio-political and economic context. We identify three distinct periods. The first period of the 1960s is characterized by an explicit support of out-migration to reduce population pressure and on remittances to promote economic growth. The second period from the 1970s to 2000 is marked by diaspora policies of Turkey relative to Europe, thereby acknowledging the role of the Turkish diaspora in the promotion of Turkish economic development and international relations. Since the year of 2000, Turkish migration policy turned to the promotion of highly skilled immigration, aiming at the promotion of technological progress towards a knowledge society with the support of intellectual elites. The policy transition towards the promotion of highly skilled immigration goes hand in hand with institutional and legal changes, which we specify.
“…This population is detainable in Turkey in part because they are perceived as a threat in Europe. To challenge immigration detention in Turkey it is therefore necessary to address the exclusionary logic of externalisation which govern multi-faceted levels of 'precarious inclusion' (Rytter and Ghandchi 2020) into Turkish society (Baban, Ilcan and Rygel 2017;Üstübici 2019).…”
Section: Immigration Detention In the Harmonisation Processmentioning
This document is the author's post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.